Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2021/Brief motivational interviewing as an intervention for addiction

References

Hello there, I have added 3 articles to your section 'Real World Application of Motivational Interviewing'. One article looks into violence and alcohol use in teens with a one-year follow-up. Another article indicates promising results into web-based E-learning for MI with nurses. And finally, there is a meta-analysis that contains 25 years worth of studies into MI: results showing that delivery mode, to who, and when are key factors towards health-behaviours. This is an interesting topic, Best of luck. U3131387 (discuss • contribs) 15:56, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Heading casing

FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:48, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title Excellent User page Created - minimal, but sufficient About me Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution Excellent - summarised with direct link(s) to evidence. Headings Well developed 3-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic. Key points Key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations. Direct quotes need page numbers (APA style) - even better, write in your own words. Be consistent in use of abbreviation MI - either always use it once established on first mention or don't use it all. Also applies to headings and sub-title (feel free to change it to MI). Overview: focus questions should be questions an image an example or case study Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters. Excellent use of examples/case studies. Use APA 7th edition style for citations with three or more authors. Write using 3rd person perspective. Write for an international, rather than Australian, audience. Use British/Australian spelling e.g., randomized -> randomised If possible, report effect sizes from key studies such as meta-analyses. Consider use of tables to summarise some information. Conclusion - emphasise practical take-home messages for each of the focus questions. Figure Excellent Caption uses APA style explains how it connects with MI and addiction References OK For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation italicisation doi formatting Resources See also Excellent External links Academic articles should go in References

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:00, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Hey. I like this so far. I can see you have used a cool format for the opening quote which is engaging. What I would suggest is a) Making the coloured boxes more interactive by adding bold and bigger headings inside them. b) I would consider revising an in-text link which is used in the heading "motivational interviewing". It is distracting, interrupts flow, and can be used elsewhere. MI is also the whole point of your chapter so it is almost useless having it linked when you are about to discuss it anyways. Loving the content thus far though. Nice work

)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits. Overview Well developed Overview. Clear focus question(s). Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest. Theory — Breadth Relevant theories are well selected, described, and clearly explained. Theory — Depth Appropriate depth is provided about the selected theory(ies). Useful examples are provided to illustrate theoretical concepts. Research — Key findings Relevant research is well reviewed. The emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses is excellent. Research — Critical thinking Excellent critical thinking about research is evident. Integration Discussion of theory and research is well integrated. Conclusion Key points are well summarised. Clear take-home message(s). Written expression — Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent. Use gender-neutral language (e.g., him -> them). Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes. Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections. Grammar Use serial commas[2] - they are part of APA style and are generally recommended by grammaticists. Here's an explanatory video (1 min). APA style Do not capitalise the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc.. Figures and tables Use APA style for Figure captions. See example. Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example: If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either: in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020) Multiple citations in parentheses should be listed in alphabetical order by first author surname. References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation[3] Page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Written expression — Learning features Overall, the use of learning features is excellent. Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. One use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding more in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Very good use of image(s). Very good use of table(s). Excellent use of feature box(es). Good use of quiz(zes). Excellent use of case studies or examples. Social contribution ~10 logged, useful, mostly minor social contributions with direct links to evidence.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:46, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic presentation. Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is presented and narrated - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Briefly explain why this topic is important. Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section. The presentation addresses the topic. An appropriate amount of content is presented. The presentation makes good/basic/little/no use of relevant psychological theory. The presentation makes little or no use of relevant psychological research. The presentation makes very good use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice. Conclusion A Conclusion slide is presented but it doesn't have take-home message(s). The presentation could be strengthened by expanding on the take-home message (e.g., answers to more than one focus question). Audio The presentation makes basic use of narrated audio. Audio communication is well paced. Consider improving articulation to enhance the clarity of speech. The audio communication is hesitant in some places - could benefit from further practice. Audio recording quality was OK. Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard clicks audible). Consider using an external microphone. Video Overall, visual display quality is good. The presentation makes good use of text and image based slides. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read. The amount of text presented per slide makes it reasonably easy to read and listen at the same time. The visual communication is supplemented by images. The presentation is basically produced using simple tools. Hide the presentation icons. Meta-data The chapter title and sub-title are used in the name of the presentation - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding. A link to the book chapter is provided but it is broken . A link from the book chapter is provided. Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated. Ideally, provide clickable links to the original image sources (e.g., in the description). A copyright license for the presentation is provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:30, 16 November 2021 (UTC)