Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2020/Self-determination theory in education

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Heading casing[edit source]

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings (or sentence casing). For example, use:

==Cats and dogs==

rather than

==Cats and Dogs==

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:57, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title and sub-title[edit source]

  1. Excellent

User page[edit source]

  1. Excellent - used effectively
  2. Description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. Link provided to book chapter

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. Excellent - summarised with direct link(s) to evidence.

Section headings[edit source]

  1. Good structure.
  2. To improve, provide less background content about SDT and more detailed content SDT in education.
  3. Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading - use 0 or 2+ sub-headings.

Key points[edit source]

  1. Use bullet points (see Tutorial 1 - Using Wikiversity)
  2. Overview - Consider adding:
    1. an image
  3. Avoid providing too much background information (e.g., about SDT). Briefly summarise generic concepts and provide internal wiki links to further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
  4. Expand theory and research in the context of education - there is lots of educational psychology academic work in this area.
  5. Educational application boxes are an excellent idea.

Image[edit source]

  1. Excellent
  2. Cite each figure at least once in the main text.

References[edit source]

  1. Very good
  2. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. doi formatting

Resources[edit source]

  1. Good
  2. Tidied up formatting and casing etc.
  3. External links - peer-reviewed articles should be in References

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 13:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
  2. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits.

Theory[edit source]

  1. Relevant theories are well selected, described, integrated, and explained.

Research[edit source]

  1. Relevant research is well reviewed and discussed in relation to theory.
  2. Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful.

Written expression[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent.
    2. Use 3rd person perspective rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you")[1].
    3. The chapter benefited from a well developed Overview and Conclusion, with clear focus question(s) and take-home messages.
  2. Layout
    1. The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections.
  3. Learning features
    1. Good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive.
    2. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
    3. Excellent use of image(s). Brilliant contribution of your own diagrams to illustrate key SDT principles - thankyou
    4. Basic use of table(s) - include APA style table caption.
    5. Very good use of feature box(es).
    6. No use of quiz(zes).
  4. Grammar
    1. Check and correct use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., individuals vs. individual's vs individuals').[2].
    2. Abbreviations
      1. Abbreviations (such as e.g., i.e.., etc.) should only be used inside parentheses.
  5. Proofreading
    1. Replace double spaces with single spaces.
  6. APA style
    1. In general, do not capitalise the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc..
    2. Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numerals (e.g., 10).
    3. Figures and tables
      1. Refer to each Table and Figure using APA style (e.g., check and correct capitalisation).
    4. Citations are not in full APA style. When citing three or more authors in-text there should be no comma after et al. For example, Smith et al. (2020) found ...
    5. References are not in full APA style. For example:
      1. Check and correct use of capitalisation.
      2. Include hyperlinked dois with full path.

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. ~5 logged, useful, social contributions with direct links to evidence
  2. Thank-you very much for the high quality image contributions to Wiki Commons.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent presentation.

Structure and content[edit source]

  1. An appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little.
  2. The presentation is well structured.
  3. The presentation makes excellent use of theory.
  4. The presentation makes good use of research.
  5. The presentation makes good use of one or more examples or case studies.
  6. A Conclusion slide is presented with a take-home message(s).

Communication[edit source]

  1. The presentation is easy to follow and interesting to watch and listen to.
  2. The presentation is easy to follow.
  3. The presentation makes effective use of animated slides with narrated audio.
  4. Well paced. Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
  5. Very good intonation to enhance listener interest and engagement.
  6. Consider improving articulation to enhance the clarity of speech.
  7. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read.
  8. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images.

Production quality[edit source]

  1. The video is very well produced.
  2. The wording of the title/sub-title is inconsistent between the name of the video, the opening slide, and/or the book chapter.
  3. Audio recording quality was very good.
  4. Visual display quality was excellent.
  5. Image sources and their copyright status are not provided.
  6. A copyright license for the presentation is not provided.
  7. A link to the book chapter is provided.
  8. A link from the book chapter is provided.
  9. A written description of the presentation is provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:26, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]