Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2020/Self-criticism and emotion

Body Dsymorphia and Eating disorders

Might be interesting to look into self-criticising that individuals with eating disorders and body dsymorphia experience.--U3177510 (discuss • contribs) 12:52, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Werner et al. (2019)

This could be useful: The clinical trait self-criticism and its relation to psychopathology: A systematic review – Update, Journal of Affective Disorders, Volume 246, 2019, Pages 530-547, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.069

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:20, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Suggestion

Hey there! Adding on to the other comments here, there seems to be a topical discussion of self-criticism and psychopathology. Therefore, I just wanted to add that high self-criticism plays an important role in Social Anxiety Disorder. If you decide to add a section related to a variety of disorders, this article may help you discuss its role in Social Anxiety Disorder: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010440X14003423?casa_token=xIcpq6TqulgAAAAA:4tez_GGoo_qJKWIGl-29HHV8ZNnHNkzY8MvFRDRPkJ9X-_QMkL-4IV0Fpxw3pyPLsWtpZ5ehcTY This article provides evidence for the role of high self-criticism in Social Anxiety Disorder and is from Lancu et al., 2015 Hope this helps with any new additions! :) --U3190016 (discuss • contribs) 04:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Heading casing

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for sentence casing. For example, the wikitext should be: == Cats and mice == rather than == Cats and Mice == -- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title and sub-title Excellent User page Excellent Social contribution Excellent Section headings See earlier comment about Heading casing. Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading - use 0 or 2+ sub-headings. Promising 2-level heading structure - could benefit from further development. Key points Overview and Conclusion plans are excellent I'm not convinced that Maslow's hierarchy of needs is the best theory for this topic. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters. There is a lack of development around "Self-criticism and its effects on human emotions" - which is vital, because this is the topic. Excellent focus on examples and case studies. Image Excellent Cite each figure at least once in the main text. References Good. For APA referencing style, check and correct: italicisation Resources Excellent

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Images

Hi, love the look of your chapter so far. However, I would suggest making the images slightly smaller. The large images give the chapter a messy feel, and having smaller images, of the same size would give your chapter a cleaner, more professional feel. U3189449 (discuss • contribs) 22:32, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a promising chapter that does a reasonably good job of applying psychological theory and research to a real-world problem. The final sections, including the Conclusion, were incomplete (at the time of submission). For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits. Theory Several relevant theories are selected, described, and explained. The chapter presents a balanced view of the potential benefits and problems associated with self-criticism. The chapter emphasises the relationship between destructive self-criticism and psychological disorders. However, this probably to the exclusion of more everyday/normal relations between self-criticism and emotion, particularly specific emotions (e.g., anger, shame, self-compassion) Research Overall, this chapter provides a good overview of relevant research. Several relevant research studies are summarised. Ideally, seek to synthesise the findings across several similar studies, rather than providing a lot of depth about a few studies (i.e., describe the forest rather than trees). When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicating the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship. Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful. Written expression Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good. Use 3rd person perspective rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you")[1]. Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead, use section linking. The lack of Conclusion meant that all-important take-home messages weren't provided. Layout The chapter is reasonably well structured, with major sections using sub-sections. For numbered lists, use Wikiversity formatting per Tutorial 1. Learning features Basic use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. Basic use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding more in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Good use of image(s). Basic use of table(s). Very good use of feature box(es). Good use of quiz(zes). Basic use of case studies or examples. More examples would be helpful (e.g., how could someone move from destructive to constructive self-criticism and what might the emotional impacts be?) Grammar Check and correct use of that vs. who. APA style Direct quotes need page numbers. Figures and tables Use APA style to refer to each Table and each Figure (e.g., do not use italics). Citations are not in full APA style. For example: If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year (e.g., Smith et al., 2020) References use correct APA style. Social contribution ~17 logged, useful (minor to moderate), social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a very good presentation. The presentation is under the maximum time limit. Structure and content An appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little. The presentation is well structured. Add and narrate an initial title/sub-title slide, to help the viewer understanding the focus and goal of the presentation. Consider adding and narrating an Overview slide (e.g., with focus questions), to help orientate the viewer about what will be covered. The presentation makes very good use of theory. The presentation makes good use of research. The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice. The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with a summary of answers to focus questions.mit. Communication The presentation is fun and interesting to watch and listen to. The presentation is sometimes hard to follow because so much visual and auditory content is presented so quickly. The presentation makes effective use of animated slides with narrated audio. Consider slowing down and leaving longer pauses between sentences (there was time available). This can help the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point. Excellent intonation and articulation enhance listener interest and engagement. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read, but often too much text is presented too quickly to allow the viewer to digest. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images. Production quality The video is well produced. The wording and/or formatting/grammar of the title/sub-title is inconsistent between the name of the video, the opening slide, and/or the book chapter. Audio recording quality was excellent. Visual display quality was very good. Mute the music during narration to help the viewer concentrate on the combination of visual information and narrated audio. Media sources are acknowledged. Their copyright status is not indicated. A copyright license for the presentation is provided. A link to the book chapter is provided. A link from the book chapter is provided. A written description of the presentation is provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)