Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2020/Meta-emotion

Chapter focus question

• Consider merging into singular question: How do meta-emotions influence our emotional lives?

U3187226 (discuss • contribs) 09:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title and sub-title Excellent= User page Excellent - used effectively Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Social contribution Excellent - summarised with direct link(s) to evidence. Section headings Excellent Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic. Key points Excellent Minor - note edits I've made to et al and p # formatting for direct quotes Image Excellent Cite each figure at least once in the main text. References Excellent Resources See also External links Excellent

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:10, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Offered some basic general feedback

Hey! Your chapter looks great and I’ve learned a lot about meta-emotion from reading it. I’ve just picked up on a few things that you can do to make things a little better 😊 • You should try to refer to all the figures used in the text – I’ve noticed you’ve done this for Figure 2., but not for Figure 1., and 5. • The last paragraph in your definition section has broken flow with the 1) and 2) in the middle of the sentence. Maybe consider removing these, or consider putting them into a list form. I’ve noticed this again in your first paragraph for response to unexpressed primary emotions section. Otherwise, everything else reads well! You’ve done a really great job with this chapter.

--U3190229 (discuss • contribs) 00:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

APA referencing, italics and formatting

Hey, your page is looking really great. I love all your examples they make the concepts clear to understand. I have just listed a few things below that may help:

1. Be careful you are using APA 7th edition. For example instead of Shaver, Veilleux, & Ham, 2013 you should put Shaver et al., 2013. Here is a link for APA 7th edition that may help https://www.mybib.com/blog/apa-style-7th-edition-changes

2. In the definition heading where you state "Within these descriptions there is some disagreement around 1) whether a meta-emotion should be considered an emotion of its own right or as a self-regulatory system, and 2) if meta-emotions stem from appraisal of a full emotion or an individual subcomponent of an emotion." It may read easier if you do 1 and 2 as separate dot points.

3. I think where you have citations in the middle of the sentence it breaks the flow of the sentence, maybe consider adding citations at the end and if you have multiple citations just add a semicolon. However in the rubric just note James didn't want more than 3 references per point.

4. Make sure you refer to figures within your text (see Figure 1)

5. Be mindful of using lots of italics. Italics are helpful to highlight a key concept or idea but I found it difficult when there are so many within a paragraph. Rather maybe you can highlight different terms through using dot points or for example in the facets of Meta emotion have italicise just experience, knowledge and strategies words rather than the whole phrase meta emotion experience. This may help it read better.

6. In your example Meta-emotional appraisal for shame-about-joy. I wasn't sure if half of the text was supposed to be bold? If so maybe just explain why this has been done.

I hope this feedback is useful. Your chapter really is looking great! --U3190210 (discuss • contribs) 01:06, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Feedback Implemented 16/10

Thanks to above users for giving detailed and helpful feedback. Everything suggested was implemented into the book chapter. Cheers, -Tia U3190467 (discuss • contribs) 03:52, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a very good chapter that successfully uses psychological theory to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. The chapter provides stronger coverage of theory than research. The initial Overview explanation of meta-emotion is confusing; perhaps a case study/example could provide a clearer illustration? For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits. Theory Relevant theories are well selected, described, integrated, and explained. Some useful examples are provided; even more could be included. Research Overall, this chapter provides a basic overview of relevant research. When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicating the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship. Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful. Written expression Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is good. Use 3rd person perspective rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you")[1]. Reduce use weasel words which bulk out the text, but don't enhance meaning (e.g., "first coined" is redundant - "coined" will do). Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned"). Instead, use section linking. Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections. Learning features Excellent use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Basic use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding more in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Very good use of image(s). Good use of table(s). Good use of feature box(es). No use of quiz(zes). Abbreviations Check and correct grammatical formatting for abbreviations (such as e.g., i.e.., etc.). APA style Citations use correct APA style. References use correct APA style. Social contribution ~8 logged, useful, social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:21, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent presentation. Structure and content An appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little. The presentation is well structured. The presentation makes excellent use of theory. The presentation makes little to no use of research. The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice. A Conclusion slide is presented with a take-home message(s). Communication The presentation is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to watch and listen to. The presentation makes effective use of text and animated image based slides with narrated audio. Well paced. Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point. Excellent intonation and articulation enhances listener interest and engagement. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images. Production quality The video is very well produced. The wording and/or formatting/grammar of the title/sub-title is inconsistent between the name of the video, the opening slide, and/or the book chapter. Audio recording quality was excellent. Visual display quality was excellent. Image sources and their copyright status are provided. A copyright license for the presentation is provided. A link to the book chapter is provided. A link from the book chapter is provided. A written description of the presentation is provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:53, 23 November 2020 (UTC)