Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2020/Fear of working out

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Social Contribution[edit source]

TLDR: Gym stigma can contribute to peoples fear of working out. Perceived social support and belonging can promote physical activity adherence.

Under the 'situations that elicit a fear response heading,' I suggest referring to gym stigma as an explanation and example. The reference below found around 70% of gym-goers felt judged for their level of fitness or body appearance at some time. Around half of those who felt judged, said it influenced their likeliness of attending a gym. This implies that people who feel they don't match up to an acceptable 'norm' at the gym are likely less likely to go due to perceived social judgement.

- Jones, K. (2017). Gym Stigma (Doctoral dissertation)

Another supporting link:

- Vartanian, L. R., & Shaprow, J. G. (2008). Effects of weight stigma on exercise motivation and behavior: a preliminary investigation among college-aged females. Journal of health psychology, 13(1), 131-138.

2. Contrast to gym stigma as a potential barrier towards physical activity. Certain types of group exercise like Crossfit show increased rates of adherence and popularity. Group fitness promotes a sense of community and belonging felt by its participants. The exercises are also scalable so everyone can perform them in spite of their fitness level. Which likely removes the social pressure and level of fitness as negative factors of gym adherence and FOWO.

- Dominski, F. H., Serafim, T. T., Siqueira, T. C., & Andrade, A. (2020). Psychological variables of CrossFit participants: a systematic review. Sport Sciences for Health, 1-21.

-Zacharydodemaide


Hi There! Great topic and very relevant as we get into summer and gyms get busy but also as we get into a stressful time of yeah. Here is a peer reviewed article: Stults-Kolehmainen, M. A., & Sinha, R. (2013). The Effects of Stress on Physical Activity and Exercise. Sports Medicine, 44(1), 81–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-013-0090-5 It shows that whilst exercise can relieve stress, an increase in cortisol (the stress hormone) can inhibit physical exercise and encourage work out avoidance. --U3174214 (discusscontribs) 08:25, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit source]

Hi there! Self-efficacy theory may be interesting to explore further. It looks at building one's confidence in their motivation, behaviour and environment and why individuals may or may not have self-efficacy. Good luck! U3177230 (discusscontribs) 08:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is an awesome topic. I've never heard it referred to this way before. From what you've already outlined I think a case study may be really useful. You could have a short story about someone with fear of working out, describing the symptoms and emotions involved. Then later on briefly discuss how each of the referenced theories could be applied to the person's situation. Good luck! U3025324 (discusscontribs) 09:38, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! Just letting you know that I edited the spelling and grammar within your overview. Feel free to change it back or continue to use it! :) --U3190016 (discusscontribs) 13:52, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sports and exercise psychology theories[edit source]

There are some good sport and exercise psychology theories to increase exercise. Theories such as the theory of planned action or the transtheoritcal model--Jackson McNee (discusscontribs) 03:35, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]


The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title and sub-title[edit source]

  1. Excellent

User page[edit source]

  1. Created
  2. Minimal, but sufficient
  3. About me
    1. Description about self provided
    2. Consider linking to your eportfolio
  4. Add link to book chapter

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. None summarised with links to evidence.

Section headings[edit source]

  1. Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic.
  2. Sections which include sub-sections should also include an overview paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.

Key points[edit source]

  1. Tone is excellent - makes topic interesting/accessible.
  2. Overview - Consider adding:
    1. focus questions.
    2. an image.
    3. a case study.
  3. Basic development of key points for each section, with relevant citations.
  4. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters.
  5. Consider including more examples/case studies.
  6. Consider using bullet points.
  7. Conclusion (the most important section) hasn't been developed.

Image[edit source]

  1. An image (figure) is presented.
  2. Caption
    1. uses APA style.
    2. could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text e.g., where's the fear?
  3. Cite each figure at least once in the main text.

References[edit source]

  1. Very good.
  2. For full APA style, use:
    1. correct italicisation

Resources[edit source]

  1. See also
    1. Excellent
  2. External links
    1. Very good
    2. Rename links so that they are more user friendly

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:19, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an insufficient chapter for three main reasons:
    1. It overly focuses on a gym context to the exclusion of other types of working out/exercise.
    2. There is too much personal opinion and too little use of peer-reviewed psychological theory and research.
    3. The quality of written expression poor, particularly grammar and proofreading.
  2. Add focus questions to guide the structure - have suggested some.
  3. This chapter is well under the maximum word count.
  4. For additional feedback, see following comments and these copyedits.

Theory[edit source]

  1. The theoretical emphasis of the chapter is on social anxiety - but what about a reluctance to work out alone, with no-one watching? What accounts for such fear? And is that fear also a factor in socially observable work out settings? Also, what about socially observable work out settings which motivate rather than demotivate participants?
  2. Why focus so much on gym settings? The topic question wasn't this specific, so the gym focus is an unwarranted detour. A gym setting can be used as an example/case study, but this chapter should take a broader perspective.
  3. There seems to be a persistent assumption with the chapter that "right reasons" are needed to go to the gym and that to be successful this must involve hard work to achieve "results". But this is just one framing. What if someone wants to just wants to exercise to enjoy themselves and doesn't need or want to see physical results? There are multiple motivations for working out, not all of which are about "achieving results", but which don't seem to be represented in the chapter.
  4. Consider comparing and contrasting FOWO with exercise addiction. See related chapter: Motivation and emotion/Book/2020/Exercise addiction
  5. The case study mentions "fun" as a motivator but this isn't mentioned elsewhere?

Research[edit source]

  1. Overall, this chapter makes insufficient use of research.
  2. When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicating the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
  3. Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful.
  4. Health benefits of working out are not part of the chapter topic. Instead, this could be mentioned briefly, with citations and link to more info.
  5. Many claims are unreferenced (e.g., see the [factual?] tags). This is not satisfactory Level 3 university writing for a science-based degree .

Written expression[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is below professional standard.
    2. Since "fear of working out" is used repeatedly, set up the FOWO abbreviation on 1st use of the term, and then use thereafter.
    3. Use third person perspective rather than first person (e.g., "we") or second person (e.g., "you") perspective[1].
    4. Use more objective language e.g,. reconsider use of "huge", "great" etc.
  2. Layout
    1. The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections.
    2. Sections which include sub-sections should also include an introductory paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
  3. Learning features
    1. No use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive.
    2. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
    3. Basic use of image(s). Renumber because one image was deleted for copyright violation.
    4. No use of table(s).
    5. Basic use of feature box(es).
    6. Very basic use of quiz. Consider asking more pertinent questions.
    7. Basic use of case studies or examples. Adding an individual case study of someone moving through a FOWO based on psychological science principles would be ideal.
  4. Grammar is problematic
    1. The grammar for many sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags).
    2. Check and make correct use of commas.
    3. Use serial commas[2] - it is part of APA style and generally recommended by grammaticists.
    4. Check and correct use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., individuals vs. individual's vs individuals').[3].
    5. Check and correct use of that vs. who.
    6. Check and correct use of affect vs. effect.
  5. Spelling
    1. Spelling can be improved (e.g., see the [spelling?] tags).
  6. Proofreading
    1. A lot more proofreading is needed to fix typos and bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard. Consider getting UC Study Help assistance.
  7. APA style
    1. Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numerals (e.g., 10).
    2. Figures and tables
      1. Use APA style for Figure captions. See example.
    3. Citations use correct APA style.
    4. References are not in full APA style. For example:
      1. Check and correct use of capitalisation.
      2. Check and correct use of italicisation.
      3. Include hyperlinked dois.

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. ~6 claimed social contributions but links were indirect, so unable to verify.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:25, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a basic presentation.

Structure and content[edit source]

  1. Comments about the book chapter also largely apply to this section (e.g., unnecessary narrowing in on gym-context, although gym could be a useful example).
  2. An appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little.
  3. The presentation is well structured.
  4. Consider adding and narrating an Overview slide (e.g., with focus questions), to help orientate the viewer about what will be covered.
  5. The presentation makes good use of theory.
  6. The presentation makes little to no use of research.
  7. The presentation makes basic use of one or more examples or case studies.
  8. The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies.
  9. A Conclusion slide is presented with a take-home message(s).

Communication[edit source]

  1. The presentation makes basic use of text based slides with narrated audio.
  2. Well paced.
  3. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read.
  4. The visual communication could be improved by including more relevant images.

Production quality[edit source]

  1. The sub-title is missing in both the video title and on the opening slide - this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. Audio recording quality was poor - very quiet. I could only hear some parts with volume on maximum.
  3. Visual display was basic.
  4. This presentation has probably violated the copyrights of image owners as images appear to have been used without permission and/or acknowledgement.
  5. A copyright license for the presentation is not provided.
  6. A link to the book chapter is not provided.
  7. A link from the book chapter is provided.
  8. A written description of the presentation is not provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:27, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]