Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2020/Eisenhower matrix and time management

Article for Eisenhower matrix

Hello there, I am looking forward to read your chapter. I have been using the Eisenhower principle professionally and it works. I would suggest for you to read this article as it will help you with the structure of your page: <https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newHTE_91.htm> --U3170318 (discuss • contribs) 09:04, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title and sub-title OK Sub-title has been corrected to be consistent with the book table of contents User page Created; minimal Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Social contribution Summarised with direct link(s) to evidence. Include page name in summary. Section headings Overview was missing Under-developed, 1-level heading structure - develop further, perhaps using a 2-level structure for the largest section(s). Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections. Key points Overview - Consider adding: a description of the problem and what will be covered focus questions an image an example or case study Basic development of key points Consider including more examples/case studies. Check and correct capitalisation e.g., Einsenhower vs. eisenhower Conclusion (the most important section): hasn't been developed what might the take-home, practical messages be? in a nutshell, what are the answer(s) to the question in the sub-title? Image Very good Note that caption could be more accurate - it is a conceptual explanation rather than an example Cite each figure at least once in the main text (should be see Figure 1 - note capitalisation). References Very good For APA referencing style, check and correct: dois should be active hyperlinks None Resources See also Also link to relevant book chapters Also link to relevant Wikipedia pages External links Very good Include a space after the link, before the parentheses

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:58, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an insufficient chapter. This chapter is well under the maximum word count. The Overview is underdeveloped. Consider: Explaining the problem or phenomenon in more detail. Presenting an illustrative case study to help engage reader interest. Developing focus questions to help guide the reader and structure the chapter. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits. Theory Overall, this chapter makes insufficient use of theory. The basic concept is described, but in insufficient detail. What is the motivational psychology behind the EM? Include more examples and/or case studies to help illustrate the principles in action. What are the practical, take-home messages. Research Overall, this chapter makes insufficient use of research. When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicating the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship. Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful. Written expression Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is below professional standard. UC Study Skills assistance is recommended to help improve writing skills to a professional standard. Some sentences are overly long; consider splitting them into shorter, separate sentences. Use 3rd person perspective rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you")[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes. Learning features Minimal use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Minimal use of image(s). No use of table(s). No use of feature box(es). No use of quiz(zes). Grammar The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags). Check and make correct use of commas. Check and correct use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., individuals vs. individual's vs individuals').[2]. Spelling Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour). Proofreading More proofreading is needed to fix typos (e.g., sentences should start with capital letters, as should proper nouns; remove repeated words e.g., "this this") and bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard. Remove unnecessary capitalisation (e.g., Time management -> time management). APA style Direct quotes need page numbers. Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numerals (e.g., 10). Figures and tables Refer to each Table and Figure using APA style (e.g., check and correct capitalisation). Citations are not in full APA style. For example: If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either: in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020) Do not include author initials. References are not in full APA style. For example: Display the full URL for hyperlinked dois. Social contribution ~3 logged, useful, social contributions with direct links to evidence.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:40, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Comments on resubmitted book chapter

These revisions have been reviewed. Comments:

1. Grammar, spelling, and formatting have been improved.
2. The Overview has been expanded to include focus questions.
3. The main improvements are in the review of research, with more mention of the EM, better use of systematic/meta-analytic reviews, and a a more critical perspective is evident.
4. Some embedded links to other chapters have been added.
5. Use of dois in the references has been improved.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:19, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an insufficient presentation. Structure and content The overview doesn't adequately explain the purpose of the presentation. The presentation doesn't start to address the topic (EM) until about half-way through - and then only a brief description of each of the EM quadrants is provided. No EM related theory or research is presented and no examples of using the EM are provided. There is no conclusion with take-home messages. Communication The presentation makes basic use of text and image based slides with narrated audio. Production quality Communicate the chapter title and sub-title in both the video title and on the opening slide - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Audio recording quality was OK. Visual display quality was OK. A copyright license for the presentation is not provided. A link to the book chapter is provided. A link from the book chapter is provided. A written description of the presentation is provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:39, 19 November 2020 (UTC)