Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2020/Dark triad personality and emotion

Additional References For interest

- Hey there, I'm a fellow classmate of yours (U3191574) - just wanted to comment- I've done an essay on Emotional Intelligence and the Dark Triad: you may find a few of these references interesting

- Zhang, W., Zou, H., Wang, M., & Finy, M. S. (2015). The role of the Dark Triad traits and two constructs of emotional intelligence on loneliness in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 74–79.

-Nagler, U. K., Reiter, K. J., Furtner, M. R., & Rauthmann, J. F. (2014). Is there a ‘‘dark intelligence”? Emotional intelligence is used by dark personalities to emotionally manipulate others. Personality and Individual Differences, 65, 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.025

- Austin, E. J., Farrelly, D., Black, C., & Moore, H. (2007). Emotional intelligence, Machiavellianism and emotional manipulation: Does EI have a dark side? Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 179–189.

Hi here's a useful journal article on the dark triad of emotions James, S., Kavanagh, P., Jonason, P., Chonody, J., & Scrutton, H. (2014). The Dark Triad, schadenfreude, and sensational interests: Dark personalities, dark emotions, and dark behaviors. Personality And Individual Differences, 68, 211-216. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.020OwenUC (discuss • contribs) 07:39, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Emotional Intelligence and dark triad

It may be an interesting side note to look into research about the dark triad, emotional intelligence and job satisfaction. I think this would be a great practical example. I have listed a helpful reference below:

Chien, C. I. C., Seo, M., & Tesluk, P. E. (2012). Emotional intelligence, teamwork effectiveness, and job performance: The moderating role of job context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 890-900. doi:10.1037/a0027377 --U3187381 (discuss • contribs) 23:32, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Social Contribution

Hi there, your topic is so interesting and I cannot wait to read the finished product :) I just wanted to say that i think your book chapter would really pop more if you add a couple more images to it! Good luck my friend --U3175502 (discuss • contribs) 07:51, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Heading casing

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for sentence casing. For example, the wikitext should be: == Cats and mice == rather than == Cats and Mice == -- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:50, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title and sub-title Very good Sub-title grammar corrected (+ question mark) User page Created - minimal, but sufficient About me Description about self provided Link provided to book chapter Social contribution None summarised with link(s) to evidence. Section headings The Overview should not have sub-headings. See earlier comment about Heading casing. Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic. Key points Use bullet points (see Tutorial 1 - Using Wikiversity) Overview - Consider adding: a description of the problem and what will be covered an image an example or case study Avoid providing too much background information (e.g., about emotion and the dark triad as separate constructs). Briefly summarise generic concepts and provide internal wiki links to further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title. Limited use of APA style citations. Basic development of key points for most sections. Lots of questions, not so many answers. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters. Consider including more examples/case studies. Conclusion (the most important section): hasn't been developed what might the take-home, practical messages be? Image An image (figure) is presented. Caption does not use APA style. could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text. Cite each figure at least once in the main text. Consider decreasing image size. References Excellent Very good Good OK For APA referencing style, check and correct: alphabetical order capitalisation italicisation doi formatting None Resources See also Use target page name Include source in brackets after link Also link to relevant book chapters Also link to relevant Wikipedia pages External links Use sentence casing Move original peer-reviewed research articles to References Include source in brackets after link

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:50, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this chapter does a very good job of applying psychological theory and research to a real-world problem. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits. Theory Relevant theories are well selected, described, integrated, and explained. Research Relevant research is well reviewed and discussed in relation to theory. When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicating the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship. Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful. Written expression Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is very good. Avoid one sentence paragraphs. A paragraph should typically consist of three to five sentences. "People" is often a better term than "individuals"; similarly "participants" is preferred to "subjects". Use 3rd person perspective rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you")[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes. Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections. Sections which branch into sub-sections should include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections. Learning features Very good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Excellent use of image(s). Thanks for contributing to Wiki Commons . No use of table(s). Very good use of feature box(es). Excellent use of quiz(zes). Grammar Check and correct use of semi-colons (;) and colons (:). Use serial commas[2] - they are part of APA style and are generally recommended by grammaticists. Here's a 1 min. explanatory video. Proofreading Replace double spaces with single spaces. APA style Do not capitalise the names of disorders, therapies, traits, theories, etc.. Figures and tables Refer to each Table and Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1). Citations are not in full APA style. For example: If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either: in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020) References use correct APA style. References are not in full APA style. For example: Include hyperlinked dois. Social contribution ~3 logged, useful, social contributions with direct links to evidence.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:52, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic presentation. Structure and content Comments about the book chapter also apply to this section. Overall, an appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little. Consider adding and narrating an Overview slide (e.g., with focus questions), to help orientate the viewer about what will be covered. The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological theory. The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological research. The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies. The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages. Communication The presentation makes basic use of text based slides with narrated audio. Audio communication is clear and well paced. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read. Some slides could be improved by presenting less text. The visual communication could be improved by including some relevant images. Production quality The video is basically produced using simple tools. The chapter title and sub-title are used on the opening slide - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. The chapter title but not the sub-title are used in the name of presentation - the latter would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Audio recording quality was excellent. Visual display quality was OK. A copyright license for the presentation is not provided. A link to the book chapter is not provided. A link from the book chapter is provided, but it was incorrect - goes to a private video - now fixed. A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)