Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, I found the following article on EBSCO which might interest you...
Sandoz, E., Moyer, D., & Armelie, A. (2015). Psychological Flexibility as a Framework for Understanding and Improving Family Reintegration Following Military Deployment. Journal Of Marital And Family Therapy, 41, 495-507. https://doi:10.1111/jmft.12086
It talks about psychological flexibility, emotion and family coherence during difficult times.
I like your use of heading and subheadings. Your page is really well organised.
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
Basic, 2-level heading structure - could benefit from further development
Sections which include sub-sections should also include an overview paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
Avoid providing too much background information. Instead, briefly summarise generic concepts and provide internal wiki links to further information. Then the focus of most of the content can be on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
Overview - consider also including a case study of someone who moves from low to high or high to low social support (e.g, case study 1 and 2 could be the same case?)
Expand content about SS and emotion; reduce content about SS and emotion as stand-alone concepts.
Consider what emotions does SS seem to best encourage?
Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles.
Consider embedding one quiz question per major section rather than having one longer quiz towards the end.
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn Canvas, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is a strong chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
The chapter could benefit from being streamlined to get closer to the 4,000 word target. For example, there are some very long paragraphs and too much background theory about emotion.
For additional feedback, see comments below and these copyedits.
Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained.
Reduce the amount of general theoretical material (e.g., about emotion). Instead, summarise and link to further information, to allow this chapter to focus on the specific topic (i.e., the sub-title question). This will get the chapter closer to the 4,000 word max. target.
Perhaps consider connecting social support to self-determination theory / basic psychological needs (relatedness).
Relevant research is well reviewed and discussed in relation to theory.
When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful.
Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences.
Overall, the quality of written expression is very good.
The chapter benefited from a well developed Overview and Conclusion, with clear focus question(s) and take-home messages.
Layout
The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections.
Learning features
Excellent use of interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. ## No use of embedded links to related book chapters. Embedding interwiki links links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Basic use of images.
No use of tables.
Very good use of feature boxes. Some of the widths should be increased to improve readability.
Basic use of quizzes.
Excellent use of case studies or examples.
Grammar
Check and correct use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., individuals vs. individual's vs individuals').[1].
Abbreviations
Abbreviations (such as e.g., i.e.., etc.) should only be used inside parentheses.
Check and correct grammatical formatting for abbreviations (such as e.g., i.e.., etc.).
APA style
Citations are not in full APA style. For example:
In-text citations should be in alphabetical order.
References are not in full APA style. For example:
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Canvas site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
