Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2019/Imagery in sport

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Jtneill in topic Multimedia feedback

Comments

[edit source]

@Sunbear25: Move the list of contributions to your Wikiversity user page. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I wonder if it might be worth exploring/explaining if imagery is different for individual or team sports persons? Just an idea, great topic I can't wait to read about it --U3092376 (discusscontribs) 08:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the idea! I'll have a look into teams utilise imagery together or if its usually done individually.Sunbear25 (discusscontribs)

Awesome start! perhaps a section on role of coach/sport psychologist in utilising/teaching imagery? You may be able to jump into rehabilitation methods using imagery too. I'd be interested in understanding more about this. --U3195279 (discusscontribs) 06:13, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I was wondering if using VR as a visualisation tool would benefit sports people that are using standard visualisation techniques? Do you think think that it would have the same benefits as the standard visualisation, or maybe even more! Might be an interesting section to look at if you have time :) --U3144248 (discusscontribs) 17:51, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I imagine you'll discuss this in your intro, but i wonder when athletes use imagery is that meaning that they are picturing themselves bigger then what they are? or more powerful then what they are? interested to read more. -u3169884

This looks like excellent work so far, well done. I'm unsure if you're at the end of your research or not but I thought I'd take this opportunity to suggest an article I'm using in my book chapter on motivation and perceived coaching in football players as it would be relevant to your topic. Bll the best.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/search/advanced?docId=10.1016%2Fj.sbspro.2014.09.224

--U3100384 (discusscontribs) 00:56, 18 October 2019 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title and sub-title

[edit source]
  1. Excellent

User page

[edit source]
  1. Created
  2. Description about self
  3. Add link to book chapter

Social contribution

[edit source]
  1. Summarised with direct links to evidence.

Section headings

[edit source]
  1. Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic.

Key points

[edit source]
  1. Overview - Consider adding:
    1. focus questions.
    2. an image.
    3. a case study.
  2. Key points are well developed for most sections, with relevant citations.
  3. Consider including more examples/case studies.
  4. Consider embedding one quiz question per major section.
  1. An image (figure) is presented.
  2. Caption uses APA style.
  3. Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text.
  4. Cite each figure at least once in the main text.

References

[edit source]
  1. OK.
  2. For full APA style, use:
    1. alphabetical order
    2. correct capitalisation
    3. correct italicisation
    4. the new recommended format for dois
    5. no issue numbers for journals which are continuously numbered within a volume (i.e., most of them).

Resources

[edit source]
  1. Good
  2. Include source in brackets

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:25, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply


Chapter review and feedback

[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn Canvas, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall

[edit source]
  1. Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
  2. For additional feedback, see comments below and these copyedits.
  1. Excellent coverage of a range of theoretical perspectives integrated with review of relevant research.
  2. Examples are provided.
  1. Relevant research is well reviewed and discussed in relation to theory.
  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is OK but would need to improve to be of professional standard.
    2. Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences.
    3. Avoid directional referencing (e.g., "As previously mentioned").
  2. Layout
    1. The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections.
  3. Learning features
    1. Good use of interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words would make the text more interactive.
    2. No use of embedded links to related book chapters. Embedding interwiki links links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
    3. Basic use of images.
    4. Basic use of tables.
    5. Good use of feature boxes.
    6. Basic use of quizzes.
    7. Excellent use of case studies or examples.
  4. Grammar
    1. The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags).
    2. Check and make correct use of commas.
    3. Use serial commas[1] - it is part of APA style and generally recommended by grammaticists.'
  5. APA style
    1. Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numerals (e.g., 10).
    2. Figures and tables
      1. Use APA style to refer to each Table and each Figure (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation).
    3. Citations are not in full APA style. For example:
      1. Use ampersand (&) inside brackets and "and" outside brackets.
      2. Do not include author initials.
      3. Remove comma from citations with two authors e.g., (MacIntyre, & Moran, 2010)
    4. References are not in full APA style. For example:
      1. See new doi format.
  1. ~14 logged, useful, social contributions across three platforms with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:38, 13 November 2019 (UTC)Reply


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Canvas site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall

[edit source]
  1. Overall, this is an excellent presentation.
  1. Well selected and structured content - not too much or too little.
  2. Add and narrate an Overview slide, to help orientate the viewer about what will be covered.
  3. The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages.
  1. The presentation is easy to follow and interesting to watch and listen to.
  2. The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides with narrated audio.
  3. Well paced. Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
  4. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read.
  5. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images.
  1. The chapter sub-title is used in the video title - also include the title - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. The chapter sub-title are used on the opening slide - also include the title - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  3. Audio and video recording quality was excellent.
  4. Image sources and their copyright status are/not provided.
  5. A link to the book chapter is provided.
  6. A link from the book chapter is provided.
  7. A written description of the presentation is provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:14, 15 November 2019 (UTC)Reply