Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Under hope and self-concept the second dot point needs to made clearer as there is currently one which is just a sentence of counselling techniques so I am unsure of what you meant to do there --Haylzw (discuss • contribs) 08:38, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
Basic, 2-level heading structure - could benefit from further development, particularly for the sections which most directly address the topic/question.
Sections which include sub-sections should also include an overview paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
Avoid providing too much background information. Instead, briefly summarise generic concepts and provide internal wiki links to further information. Then the focus of most of the content can be on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
Hi, I really liked how you incorporated different definitions of Hope because I didn't know that there could be so many meanings regarding that term. Furthermore, I also liked how you expanded on how Hope can either be a motivator or a demotivator.
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, I thought that looking at hope in popular culture was an interesting topic to explore! I especially loved how you looked into the Disney and Pixar movies and explored how they related to hope motivation. That was really interesting.--U3144248 (discuss • contribs) 20:52, 20 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn Canvas, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this chapter makes insufficient use of research.
Many statements are unreferenced (e.g., see the [factual?] tags).
When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful.
Overall, the quality of written expression is mediocre.
Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences.
Use third person perspective rather than first person (e.g., "we") or second person (e.g., "you") perspective.
Layout
Sections which include sub-sections should also include an introductory paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
Avoid having sections with only one sub-section.
Learning features
Very basic use of interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words would make the text more interactive.
No use of embedded links to related book chapters. Embedding interwiki links links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Very basic use of images. Increase display size of Figure 2 to make it easier to read.
Basic use of tables. Add table caption per APA style.
No use of feature boxes.
Basic use of quizzes.
Basic use of case studies or examples.
Grammar
The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags).
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Canvas site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
A reasonable, if somewhat bland description of hope theory is provided. The presentation seems to focus more on hope theory itself as opposed to addressing the question "In what ways does hope influence our motivational lives?".
Add and narrate a Title slide, to help the viewer understanding the focus and goal of the presentation.
Add and narrate an Overview slide, to help orientate the viewer about what will be covered.
The Conclusion slide could be strengthened by adding practical, take-home message(s).
The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages.
Use the chapter title and sub-title on the opening slide and in the name of the video because this helps to match the book chapter and to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
It sounds like an on-board microphone rather than a plugged-in microphone was used to record the audio (e.g., keyboard strokes can be heard). Review set-up.
Image sources and their copyright status are provided.
A copyright license for the presentation is not provided.
A link to the book chapter is not provided.
A link from the book chapter is not provided.
A written description of the presentation is not provided.