Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2019/Hope and motivation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Jtneill in topic Multimedia feedback

Comment

[edit source]

Under hope and self-concept the second dot point needs to made clearer as there is currently one which is just a sentence of counselling techniques so I am unsure of what you meant to do there --Haylzw (discusscontribs) 08:38, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title and sub-title

[edit source]
  1. Good

User page

[edit source]
  1. No info about self or link to book chapter

Social contribution

[edit source]
  1. 1 claimed but no direct link to evidence
  2. Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.

Section headings

[edit source]
  1. Basic, 2-level heading structure - could benefit from further development, particularly for the sections which most directly address the topic/question.
  2. Sections which include sub-sections should also include an overview paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
  3. Avoid providing too much background information. Instead, briefly summarise generic concepts and provide internal wiki links to further information. Then the focus of most of the content can be on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
  4. Conclusion added
  5. References added

Key points

[edit source]
  1. Key points are well developed for earlier sections, but underdeveloped for the latter sections.
  2. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles.
  3. Consider introducing a case study in the Overview.
  4. Consider embedding one quiz question per major section rather than having one longer quiz towards the end.
  1. Provided, with an APA style caption
  2. Cite each figure at least once in the main text.

References

[edit source]
  1. The formatting varies between references.

Resources

[edit source]
  1. See also
    1. See suggested reformatting
  2. External inks
    1. None provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:25, 28 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I really liked how you incorporated different definitions of Hope because I didn't know that there could be so many meanings regarding that term. Furthermore, I also liked how you expanded on how Hope can either be a motivator or a demotivator.

--U3160221 (discusscontribs) 11:45, 18 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

[edit source]

@U3177509: Use interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles. For example: Who was Nostradamus? Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Comment

[edit source]

Hi, I thought that looking at hope in popular culture was an interesting topic to explore! I especially loved how you looked into the Disney and Pixar movies and explored how they related to hope motivation. That was really interesting.--U3144248 (discusscontribs) 20:52, 20 October 2019 (UTC)Reply


Chapter review and feedback

[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn Canvas, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall

[edit source]
  1. Overall, this is a basic, but sufficient chapter.
  2. Overview
    1. unnecessary discursion into spirituality. Spirituality may be an aspect of hope but it doesn't warrant being such a major focus of the Overview.
    2. Consider adding focus questions.
    3. Consider adding a case study.
    4. Consider adding an image.
  3. For additional feedback, see comments below and these copyedits.
  1. Overall, this chapter makes basic use of theory.
  2. There is a lack of sufficient citations.
  3. The section on hope and faith takes is inexplicably Christian-biased.
  1. Overall, this chapter makes insufficient use of research.
  2. Many statements are unreferenced (e.g., see the [factual?] tags).
  3. When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
  4. Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful.
  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the quality of written expression is mediocre.
    2. Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences.
    3. Use third person perspective rather than first person (e.g., "we") or second person (e.g., "you") perspective.
  2. Layout
    1. Sections which include sub-sections should also include an introductory paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
    2. Avoid having sections with only one sub-section.
  3. Learning features
    1. Very basic use of interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words would make the text more interactive.
    2. No use of embedded links to related book chapters. Embedding interwiki links links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
    3. Very basic use of images. Increase display size of Figure 2 to make it easier to read.
    4. Basic use of tables. Add table caption per APA style.
    5. No use of feature boxes.
    6. Basic use of quizzes.
    7. Basic use of case studies or examples.
  4. Grammar
    1. The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags).
    2. Check and make correct use of commas.
    3. Use serial commas[1] - it is part of APA style and generally recommended by grammaticists.
    4. Check and correct use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., individuals vs. individual's vs individuals').[2].
    5. Check and correct use of affect vs. effect.
  5. Spelling
    1. Spelling can be improved (e.g., see the [spelling?] tags).
  6. Proofreading
    1. Remove unnecessary capitalisation (e.g., Hope).
    2. Replace double spaces with single spaces.
  7. APA style
    1. Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numerals (e.g., 10).
    2. Direct quotes need page numbers.
    3. Figures and tables
      1. Use APA style for Figure captions. See example.
      2. Use APA style to refer to each Table and each Figure (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation).
    4. Citations are not in full APA style. For example:
      1. A serial comma is needed before "&" or "and" for citations involving three or more authors.
    5. References are not in full APA style.
  1. ~2 logged social contributions with no direct links to evidence.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:50, 13 November 2019 (UTC)Reply


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Canvas site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall

[edit source]
  1. Overall, this is a basic, insufficient presentation.
  1. A reasonable, if somewhat bland description of hope theory is provided. The presentation seems to focus more on hope theory itself as opposed to addressing the question "In what ways does hope influence our motivational lives?".
  2. Add and narrate a Title slide, to help the viewer understanding the focus and goal of the presentation.
  3. Add and narrate an Overview slide, to help orientate the viewer about what will be covered.
  4. The Conclusion slide could be strengthened by adding practical, take-home message(s).
  5. The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages.
  1. The presentation is rather pedestrian - a small number of mostly text-based slides presenting using small font size.
  2. Consider using greater intonation to enhance listener interest and engagement.
  1. Use the chapter title and sub-title on the opening slide and in the name of the video because this helps to match the book chapter and to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. It sounds like an on-board microphone rather than a plugged-in microphone was used to record the audio (e.g., keyboard strokes can be heard). Review set-up.
  3. Image sources and their copyright status are provided.
  4. A copyright license for the presentation is not provided.
  5. A link to the book chapter is not provided.
  6. A link from the book chapter is not provided.
  7. A written description of the presentation is not provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:46, 15 November 2019 (UTC)Reply