Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2019/Honesty-humility and work performance

Social Contribution

Hello! I enjoyed reading your section about the dark triad and how it relates to work performance - I have just completed my own chapter about the dark triad and emotion.

You made some really great points throughout your chapter - it would be great if there were a few more images to go along with them :)

- Melissa Hogan

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title, sub-title, TOC Excellent User page Very good Social contribution OK Link doesn't go directly to evidence of contribution See suggestions for how to record social contributions Section headings Simple, logical, 2-level structure which is directly focused on the topic Key points Well developed Conclusion - Underdeveloped - this is the most important section Image Use APA style for captions Expand figure caption to explain how it relates to one or more key points in the text References Use APA style Resources External links - Not provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:58, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Helpful sources

https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User:U3099910

Honesty–humility and a person–situation interaction at work - https://canberra.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=wj10.1002%2Fper.757&context=PC&vid=61ARL_CNB:61ARL_CNB&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Primo%20Central&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,Honesty%E2%80%93humility%20and%20a%20person%E2%80%93situation%20interaction%20at%20work&mode=Basic. Hi I think this source relates very strongly with what you're doing.

Honesty–humility and a person–situation interaction at work - https://canberra.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=apa_articles10.1037%2Fh0072433&context=PC&vid=61ARL_CNB:61ARL_CNB&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Primo%20Central&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,The%20measurement%20of%20conflict%20between%20honesty%20and%20group%20loyalty.&offset=0 this should proving some helpful information on your topic.

Dictionary definitions

Instead of dictionary definitions, I recommend using and citing academic peer-reviewed sources. Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:00, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Article suggestion and Dark Triad

The following article suggests an empirical definition of what the honesty-humility dimensions exactly encompasses. Since it is a scale, it gives a detailed explanation of the characteristics of individuals who score either significantly high or low on the facet, which could be useful to your chapter since you also aim to look into the Dark Triad personality.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326362747_Individual_Differences_in_Selfishness_as_a_Major_Dimension_of_Personality_A_Reinterpretation_of_the_Sixth_Personality_Factor

I'm also delving into Dark Triad personalities for my book chapter so if you've yet to finish your section on that, feel free to visit my page.

https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Motivation_and_emotion/Book/2019/Emotional_intelligence_and_anti-social_behaviour

--U3054327 (discuss • contribs) 07:55, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn Canvas, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. Overview - consider building on the sub-title by presenting focus questions to help guide the reader and the chapter structure. This chapter is well under/over the maximum word count. For additional feedback, see following comments and these copyedits. Theory Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained. The Overview could be improved by having a greater emphasis on the relationship between HH and work performance. There is too much general theoretical material. Instead, summarise and link to further information (such as other book chapters or Wikipedia articles), to allow this chapter to focus on the specific topic (i.e., the sub-title question). For example, the Big 5 personality factor background is probably unnecessary. Just summarise and link to relevant Wikipedia and/or Wikiversity articles. Instead, focus in on the aspects of the Big 5 model which help to inform and understand HH and work performance. Similarly, not so much is needed by way of background about the HEXACO model. INstead, zero in on HH and work performance. The Conclusion is excellent and well balanced. Research Relevant research is well reviewed and discussed in relation to theory. Excellent inclusion of major reviews including meta-analyses. When describing important research findings, consider including the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship. Written expression Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is excellent. Some of the bullet-points should have been in full paragraph format. Use third person perspective rather than first person (e.g., "we") or second person (e.g., "you") perspective[1]. Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections. Sections which include sub-sections should also include an introductory paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings. Learning features No use of embedded interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. No use of embedded links to related book chapters. Embedding links links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Use in-text interwiki links, rather than external links. Very basic use of images. No use of tables. Tables could have been a good way to organise descriptions of the FFM/HEXACO factors. No use of feature boxes. No use of quizzes. No use of case studies or examples. Grammar Use serial commas[2] - it is part of APA style and generally recommended by grammaticists. Proofreading Remove unnecessary capitalisation (e.g., "Dark"). APA style Refer to each Table and Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1). Citations are not in full APA style. For example: Use ampersand (&) inside brackets and "and" outside brackets. A serial comma is needed before "&" or "and" for citations involving three or more authors. References are not in full APA style. For example: See new doi format. Social contribution ~1 logged social contributions without direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:06, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Canvas site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a good presentation. This presentation makes effective use of simple tools. Structure and content An appropriate amount of content is presented - not too much or too little. Could narrow in more precisely on HH and workplace performance. However, the broader context and relationships were also very useful. The presentation is well structured. Add and narrate a Title slide, to help the viewer understanding the focus and goal of the presentation. Add and narrate an Overview slide (e.g., with focus questions), to help orientate the viewer about what will be covered. The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages. Communication The presentation is easy to follow and interesting to watch and listen to. The presentation makes effective use of text and image based slides with narrated audio. Well paced. Very good intonation to enhance listener interest and engagement. The font size is mostly sufficiently large to make it easy to read. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images. Production quality Communicate the chapter title and sub-title in both the video title and on the opening slide - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Audio recording quality was excellent. Visual display quality was very good. Image sources are provided in a general sense, but ideally provide the specific links and licenses for each image. A copyright license for the presentation is provided in the video description but not in the meta-data. A link to the book chapter is provided. A link from the book chapter wasn't provided; now added. A very brief written description of the presentation is provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:15, 22 November 2019 (UTC)