Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2019/Emotional intelligence and anti-social behaviour

Social Contribution

Hello, I really enjoyed reading your chapter. I've just finished doing my own chapter on emotion and the dark triad. I've added a link to an article which I believe you have cited, however it suggests that dark triad personalities do actually possess empathy they're just selective about how and when they use it (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S019188691300202X).

There's also been some research suggesting that dark triad personalities don't have EI, but that it is actually just a low score of Neuroticism. I thought you might enjoy this for your own intrinsic interest :)

- Melissa Hogan

Social Contribution

Hi there, firstly congratulations on a fantastic chapter. The only suggestion I would make is to possibly put in one or two more external links. At it is such a broad topic this may help cover more content. --BMPENFOLD (discuss • contribs) 07:56, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title and sub-title Excellent User page Created, with description about self and link to book chapter Used effectively Social contribution 1 summarised with direct link to evidence Section headings Overly complicated 4-level heading structure - simplify Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading - use 0 or 2+ sub-headings. Avoid providing too much background information. Instead, briefly summarise generic concepts and provide internal wiki links to further information. Then the focus of most of the content can be on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title. Key points Key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations. Overview - Consider adding focus questions. Consider introducing a case study in the Overview. Consider including more examples/case studies. Consider embedding one quiz question per major section. Image An image (figure) is presented. Caption uses APA style. Cite each figure at least once in the main text. References Excellent Resources Excellent

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:51, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Heading casing

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings (or sentence casing). For example, use: ==Cats and dogs== rather than ==Cats and Dogs== -- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:40, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Social contribution

Good job on the chapter. It looks like it was well thought out and structured. Keep going, you're doing great! --U3158296 (discuss • contribs) 00:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn Canvas, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a solid chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. For additional feedback, see comments below and these copyedits. Theory Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained. Overview - what does anti-socially upright mean? (clarify) More examples or case studies would be helpful. Research Relevant research is well reviewed and discussed in relation to theory. When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship. Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful. Written expression Written expression Overall, the chapter is reasonably well written. Use third person perspective rather than first person (e.g., "we") or second person (e.g., "you") perspective. Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences. Learning features For numbered lists, use Wikiversity formatting per Tutorial 1. Excellent use of interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. No use of embedded links to related book chapters. Embedding interwiki links links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Basic use of images. Answer to Figure 1? Discuss. No use of tables. Excellent use of feature boxes. Basic use of quizzes. The quiz questions could be more effective as learning prompts by being embedded as single questions within each corresponding section rather than being presented as a set of questions at the end. Basic use of case studies or examples. Ideally, provide an EI and anti-social behaviour case study. Grammar The grammar for several sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags). Check and correct use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., individuals vs. individual's). Use serial commas[1] - it is part of APA style and generally recommended by grammaticists. Check and correct use of that vs. who. APA style Refer to each Table and Figure at least once within the main text (e.g., see Figure 1). Citations are not in full APA style. For example: In-text citations should be in alphabetical order. Use ampersand (&) inside brackets and "and" outside brackets. A serial comma is needed before "&" or "and" for citations involving three or more authors. References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of italicisation. Social contribution ~9 logged, useful, social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:15, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Canvas site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a solid, basic presentation. This presentation uses simple tools. Structure and content Well selected, on topic content - not too much or too little. The presentation is well structured. Add and narrate an Overview slide (e.g., with focus questions), to help orientate the viewer about what will be covered. A basic Conclusion slide is presented. Communication The presentation is easy to follow. The presentation makes use of mainly text-based slides with narrated audio. Well paced. Some of the font size should be larger to make it easier to read. The visual communication could be improved by including more images. Production quality The chapter title but not the sub-title are used in the video title - the latter would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. The chapter title and sub-title are used on the opening slide - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Audio recording quality was excellent. Visual display quality was basic. Image sources is provided briefly at the end, but the image is not free to use: https://money.cnn.com/2009/03/16/news/madoff_assets/index.htm. Down the bottom: All rights reserved. Either re-record without the image or remove the presentation to avoid further copyright violation. A copyright license for the presentation is not provided. A link to the book chapter is not provided. A link from the book chapter is provided. A written description of the presentation is not provided (the title is repeated in the description).

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:34, 19 November 2019 (UTC)