The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
I found this chapter to be a interesting read. Especially in regards to the changing way society functions with the advent of social media. The fact that a mistake from 15+ years ago can resurface online and so often society fails to accept any apology that may have been made on the part of the (much younger and less experienced) offender. I found your use of theoretical models and case study well done and useful.
I found this chapter interesting to read. You did a good job at explaining Boyds apology model. Great work!
--U3158296 (discuss • contribs) 01:00, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
I think it's clear you've done a lot of work to your book chapter and it looks great. Have you considered putting in case studies to ensure your explanation is related. --BMPENFOLD (discuss • contribs) 07:41, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn Canvas, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem. Theory and practice are strengths. The main area for development is the integration of critical review of research.
This chapter is slightly over the maximum word count (e.g., consider abbreviating the Overview; focus questions (repeated) removed from Conclusion).
For additional feedback, see comments below and [ these copyedits].
Relevant research citations are well integrated, but probably lacks detail/depth.
When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful.