The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn Canvas, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this chapter does a good job of applying psychological theory and research to a real-world problem. A strength is that the chapter is quite comprehensive. Areas for improvement include providing a really clear, simple description of the theory and the quality of written expression, including closer referencing.
Overall, this chapter makes sufficient use of research.
Some relevant research is described, but this could be more systematic and discussed in relation to ART.
Many claims are unreferenced (e.g., see the [factual?] tags).
When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful.
Avoid one sentence paragraphs. A paragraph should typically consist of three to five sentences.
Use bullet-points and numbered lists, per Tutorial 1.
No use of embedded links to related book chapters. Embedding interwiki links links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. For example, this would be ideal for the discussion of applications (e.g., to eating disorders).
Very good use of images. Check order.
No use of tables.
Good use of feature boxes. Increase width for quizzes.
Good use of quizzes.
Good use of case studies or examples.
The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags).
Promising, but too much content is covered too quickly - be more selective.
There is a lack sufficient scene setting. The sub-title question is not established, so it is difficult for the viewer to know what the presentation is going to be about. There is initial explanation of ART warrants more time being spent on it, because unless it is clearly understood (e.g., include examples), the rest of the presentation doesn't make much sense. This basic explanation is probably more important than "related theories"- instead the presentation starts with a general description of emotion.
There is some promising use of applied examples, but these really need to be tied much more closer to understanding and applying key aspects of ART.
The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages.