The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
It is not clear or convincing from the current proposed structure and key points how the chapter will address the theory and research marking criteria
Generic proposed sections such as "Emotion" aren't necessary. Instead, cover such concepts briefly within the Overview or subsequent sections, with links to dedicated Wikiversity/Wikipedia resources for more info. This will allow the bulk of the structure to be focused on addressing the core topic (i.e., the chapter's sub-title).
Questions - good, but maybe consolidate - once these are decided upon, then it should help to guide the chapter structure
Consider introducing one or more case studies to help engage reader interest (e.g., perhaps a scenario where emojis/emoticons are used to good effect, and perhaps another example where they don't work so well in communicating emotions)
Conclusion - underdeveloped - but this is the most important section
Hi Daniele, I think your chapter will be super interesting to read when its finished. While not exactly on the same topic, I think our chapters have some similar themes - I'm doing Sexting Motivation. When you come to adding all your content, I recommend adding some content between the headings and subheadings to give an overview of the oncoming content. This should help with the flow of the chapter. I hope your chapter writing goes well! --Brittany (u3117719) (discuss • contribs) 02:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Some statements are unreferenced (e.g., see the [factual?] tags).
Some relevant research is described.
Some relevant critique of research is evident in the Conclusion.
When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
Greater emphasis on major reviews and meta-analyses would be helpful.
Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numbers (e.g., 10).
Direct quotes need page numbers.
Direct quotes should be embedded within sentences and paragraphs, rather than dumped holus-bolus. Even better, communicate the concept in your own words.
Refer to each Table and each Figure at least once within the main text.
Provide more detailed Figure captions to help connect the figure to the text.
This chapter does not currently use APA style for citations (e.g., citations should not include author initials, a comma is need before the year, and use of et al. (capitalisation, commas, full-stops) is incorrect).