Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2017/Oxytocin and trust

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

References[edit]

I thought this site would be of some help for creating a definition! http://changingminds.org/explanations/trust/what_is_trust.htm --Maddison Frost (discusscontribs) 07:15, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

If you need a new reference to read through this one seems like a good place to start. “Nave, G., Camerer, C., & McCullough, M. (2015). Does oxytocin increase trust in humans? A critical review of research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(6), 772-789. Doi:10.1177/1745691615600138” if you can’t find it maybe try this link: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7824/1ff9500638e9e09388fbfacf7197d2f35837.pdf Also this one could also be useful if you want an example of a more practical example. “Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2013). Sniffing around oxytocin: review and meta-analyses of trials in healthy and clinical groups with implications for pharmacotherapy. Translational psychiatry, 3(5), e258. doi:10.1038/tp.2013.34” Hope this helps, you’ve picked a really interesting topic :D. --Dom M.S (discusscontribs) 04:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)


I found this article you may find of interest, it discusses a study which investigated specific genes which regulate oxytocin and found they are associated with the friendliness and sociality of young people, particularly higher expressions of the genes = friendlier, which may potentially mean more trusting. It is a recent article and pretty interesting. It may be beneficial for level of trust in friendships and further social relationships. Here is the link to the article: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/08/170822103053.htm. Hope this is helpful, looking forward to seeing where you go with the chapter! --Tahliachristofersen (discusscontribs) 00:12, 2 September 2017 (UTC)-

Also found another study: oxytocin impairs lie detection between the sexes. Interesting read! Here is the link: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28711722. Again, hope it helps! --Tahliachristofersen (discusscontribs) 00:28, 2 September 2017 (UTC)


Hey, so I found this article on Oxytocin, Trust and Money (Mikolajczak et al., 2010) and I thought it was interesting to read and may be useful for your book chapter, hopefully it is helpful!--NHP96 (discusscontribs) 08:03, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Heya! Additionally, I found an interesting research article about Oxytocin, vasopressin, and human social behaviour (Heinrichs, von Dawans & Domes, 2009) it is an interesting read and hopefully it helps further your research :) --NHP96 (discusscontribs) 02:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Internal links[edit]

Hi, I noticed you had not yet started your 'see also' section. I found a completed book chapter from the 2013 book on oxytocin and emotion that references your topic in section 3.1. I thought this might be helpful internal link to use for your 'see also' section and to find starter references. Here is the link to the aforementioned book chapter: Oxytocin and Emotion book chapter, 2013

--U3143144 (discusscontribs) 21:31, 29 August 2017 (UTC)


Topic development review and feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks will be available later via Moodle. Keep an eye on Announcements. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Autoroute icone.svg

Title, sub-title, TOC[edit]

  1. Excellent

User page[edit]

  1. Created
  2. Used effectively

Social contribution[edit]

  1. Well summarised, with some direct links to evidence.
  2. The best links go to direct evidence of the contributions made. View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click compare, and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see the book chapter author guidelines.

Section headings[edit]

  1. Reasonable, basic 3-level heading structure
  2. Sections which include sub-sections should also include an overview paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
  3. Make sure to avoid providing too much background/generic material. Instead briefly summarise background concepts and provide wiki links to further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question posed by the sub-title of chapter. The least important sections are what is oxytocin, what is trust etc. The most important sections in terms of addressing the marking criteria will be What is the effect of oxytocin on trust? and its sub-sections.

Key points[edit]

  1. Key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations.
  2. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles.
  3. Consider including more examples/case studies.
  4. Consider embedding one quiz question per major section rather than having one longer quiz towards the end.

Image[edit]

  1. Excellent

References[edit]

  1. Good.
  2. For full APA style:
    1. Use correct italicisation
    2. Make the dois into active hyperlinks so they can be easily clicked
    3. Do not include issue numbers for journals which are continuously numbered within a volume

Resources[edit]

  1. Excellent

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Edits[edit]

Your page is looking very good! However i just moved a few images to stop them from preventing the heading lines meeting the full length of the page. --Maddison Frost (discusscontribs) 05:04, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Added a hyperlink to a word I felt need explaining. Only because i used it in my wiki.--Maddison Frost (discusscontribs) 10:33, 22 October 2017 (UTC)


Chapter review and feedback[edit]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Wikiuutiset logo typewriter.png

Overall[edit]

  1. Overall, this is a fantastic chapter - well balanced, well researched, rich theory, interesting, with practical implications, and it makes excellent use of the wiki environment.
  2. For additional feedback, see these copyedits.

Theory[edit]

  1. Theories were very well described and integrated with research and examples.

Research[edit]

  1. Research was well selected and explained in interesting, relevant ways.
  2. When describing important research findings, indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.

Written expression[edit]

  1. Written expression
    1. The chapter is very well written.
    2. The chapter benefits from a well developed Overview and Conclusion, with clear focus question(s) (Overview).
  2. Learning features
    1. Interwiki links were well used.
    2. Images, quizzes, and examples were also well used.
  3. Spelling, grammar and proofreading
    1. Check and correct use of that vs. who
    2. Check and correct use of ownership apostrophes e.g., individuals -> individual's
    3. Citations
      1. A comma is needed before "&" for citations involving three or more authors
      2. et al. should have a full-stop
    4. References are not in full APA style e.g.,
      1. Check and correct italicisation of journal numbers
      2. Do not include issue numbers for journals which are continuously numbered within volumes.


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Multimedia.png

Overall[edit]

  1. Overall, this is a good presentation.

Structure and content[edit]

  1. Content is well selected and organised.
  2. Maybe add - what is a hormone?
  3. Include more citations?
  4. Besides introducing oxytocin via e.g., nasal spray, how can we boost endogenous production?
  5. Useful take home messages.

Communication[edit]

  1. Audio is clear.
  2. Visuals are clear.

Production quality[edit]

  1. Audio quality seems to vary a bit between slides.
  2. Meta-data and links are good.
  3. No links to image sources?

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:34, 24 November 2017 (UTC)