Talk:Galaxy Zoo

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

The web page has been saved by the Internet Archive. Please consider linking to an appropriate archived version: [29]. --Mu301Bot 14:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I've updated the link to to see if this clears up the login redirect. --mikeu talk 15:06, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

April 2017

I'm not exactly sure what's wrong, but the link didn't work. I googled Galaxy Zoo and it looks like the first link that comes up is working. Svrangerchrista (discusscontribs) 20:02, 23 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Svrangerchrista: It's been fixed. Thank you for pointing it out. Green Giant (discusscontribs) 20:35, 23 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm putting this into the prod (proposed deletion) bin

None of the links work, and edit was done by User:Mu301 in 2008. The Prod template will give Mu301 time to step in.--Guy vandegrift (discusscontribs) 04:35, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The links on the main article work fine for me... Omphalographer (discusscontribs) 04:36, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It only has two links: is dead, and w:Galaxy Zoo is the WP article. I think Dave would use {{Softredirect}} to w:Galaxy Zoo, but I don't know the policy on deleting the page in a case like this. ... {{ping|Dave Braunschweig}} Since it's so easy to reverse, I will just blank the page and do the soft redirect (Mu301 worked on this, so blanking would make it easy for him to come in and fix the external link if that is all that's wrong with this) --Guy vandegrift (discusscontribs) 04:57, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply] works perfectly fine for me - it redirects to, which is the intended target. Omphalographer (discusscontribs) 05:03, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
EEExcuse Me!!!, I saw a black page and took it for a "this page does not exist" (didn't bother to read it and forgot that the sky is black) I will return it to normal and take Dave out of the loopGuy vandegrift (discusscontribs) 05:10, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't have much of an opinion one way or another. This page has much less content than the WP article, and our resource really doesn't add any WV specific learning activity. I would be fine with a soft redirect or leaving it alone. I don't see much hope in this page developing here given that it has been dormant for over a decade. --mikeu talk 23:37, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Omphalographer and Mu301: If neither of you object, I will just leave it alone. We have stinkier fish to fry.Guy vandegrift (discusscontribs) 03:15, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]