Literature/1981/Haugeland
| Authors | ||
|---|---|---|
| A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z & |
||
- Mind Design II: Philosophy, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence. Second Edition. MIT Press, 1997. [1]
Editor
[edit | edit source]Excerpts
[edit | edit source]Wikimedia
[edit | edit source]Chronology
[edit | edit source]- Haugeland, John (1985). Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea. MIT Press.
- Gentner, Dedre & Albert L. Stevens, eds. (1983). Mental Models. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN 0-89859-242-9. [^]
- Philip N. Johnson-Laird (1983). Mental Models: Toward a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference and Consciousness. Harvard University Press. [^]
- John Haugeland, ed. (1981). Mind Design. MIT Press. [^]
- Literature/1979/Dreyfus [^]
- Bobrow, Daniel G. & Allan M. Collins eds. (1975). Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science (Language, Thought, and Culture). New York, NY: Academic Press. [^]
Reviews
[edit | edit source]- Longguet-Higgins, Christopher (1982). "Review of Mind Design", New Scientist (7 January 1982) p. 34. [2]
Comments
[edit | edit source]
Notes
[edit | edit source]
http://books.google.com/advanced_book_search
|
|---|
| The shade of the bar looks invariant in isolation but variant in context, in (favor of) sharp contrast with the color gradient background, hence an innate illusion we have to reasonably interpret and overcome as well as the mirage. Such variance appearing seasonably from context to context may not only be the case with our vision but worldview in general in practice indeed, whether a priori or a posteriori. Perhaps no worldview from nowhere, without any point of view or prejudice at all!
Ogden & Richards (1923) said, "All experience ... is either enjoyed or interpreted ... or both, and very little of it escapes some degree of interpretation." H. G. Wells (1938) said, "The human individual is born now to live in a society for which his fundamental instincts are altogether inadequate." |