User talk:IM Serious

Welcome! Hello and Welcome to Wikiversity IM Serious! You can contact us with questions at the colloquium or me personally when you need help. Please remember to sign and date your finished comments when participating in discussions. The signature icon above the edit window makes it simple. All users are expected to abide by our Privacy, Civility, and the Terms of Use policies while at Wikiversity. To get started, you may Take a guided tour and learn to edit. Visit a (kind of) random project. Browse Wikiversity, or visit a portal corresponding to your educational level: pre-school, primary, secondary, tertiary, non-formal education. Find out about research activities on Wikiversity. Explore Wikiversity with the links to your left. Enable VisualEditor under Beta settings to make article editing easier. Read an introduction for teachers and find out how to write an educational resource for Wikiversity. Give feedback about your initial observations Discuss Wikiversity issues or ask questions at the colloquium. Chat with other Wikiversitans on #wikiversity-en. Follow Wikiversity on twitter (http://twitter.com/Wikiversity) and identi.ca (http://identi.ca/group/wikiversity). You do not need to be an educator to edit. You only need to be bold to contribute and to experiment with the sandbox or your userpage. See you around Wikiversity! --Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 14:38, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Research

Welcome to Wikiversity. Note that research should promote the research rather than the researcher. Let me know if you have any questions. -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 14:40, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Dear Dave Braunschweig, thanks for your welcome, i appreciate your constructive suggestion of prepending an intro (www.pnas.org prohibits naming your intro intro) in http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Magnetic_Gravity?oldid=1793414&diff=prev

I am bootstrapping in a catch 22: start with uncontestable gravity/inertia and have readers wonder how this is leading to magnetism or start with unverified claims and have readers wonder when if ever any formulae will follow. You might have noticed that i saved formulae in a preprint state (lest i suffer from data loss due to browser crash or cookie expiry) and that i want to get the math right (integration by substitution seems to come to the rescue here) before i write commentary around wrong math and that meanwhile i wanted to divert attention to the creative commons publication i intend to straighten here. Rest assured that the main theme of Magnetic Gravity shall be the gravitational attraction explainable by electromagnetism and that no more than 2 researchers' (JSánchez and PMJack) pivotal puzzle pieces shall be featured that big and that i ain't one of them nor related to them.

Once this becomes a complete presentation and a full-blown research project and course material, we can refactor for optimal style. In any case, i consider your "The following equation:[1]" no equivalent substitute for my meagre but complete English sentence, "Vixra.org" unsuitable for an author's name, and while Template:cite journal |last=Sánchez |year=2017 |url=http://file.scirp.org/pdf/JHEPGC_2016122915423655.pdf |accessdate= 2017-12-26 may be house style, it is currently wrongly adding brackets, and thus i am about to improve the earlier mess, where i was just playing with new styles (my experimental bibliography style goes from machine-readable and unique and retrievable to human-readable and bold like a href=url >humanese) since i have already been converging back to good old standards in the math formulation as you can see.

Can you please award IM Serious (discuss • contribs) 18:27, 26 December 2017 (UTC) more patience?

I'm sorry I wasn't more clear. This isn't a formatting issue, but a promotional issue. You are free to reference the source article however you wish, but you may not promote the author in the process. Focus on educating the reader instead. Thanks for your understanding. -- Dave Braunschweig (discuss • contribs) 02:08, 27 December 2017 (UTC)