I've had a read of your chapter and it's coming together very nicely! I loved your integration of theory and research. I have added a couple of comments for you to consider and I hope these are helpful :) Where I have put the 'factual' comment, I thought your argument could be strengthened with a citation of a source. Perhaps to make the research section even stronger, you could add how many participants were included. Well done, and I look forward to seeing your final book chapter! U3216883 (discuss • contribs) 23:03, 3 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your chapter on Machiavellianism and Power Motivation is fascinating and well-organised, especially with the practical examples and strong integration of theories. It really sheds light on how Machiavellian traits manifest in everyday settings. I’d love to see some quiz questions added to engage readers even more and reinforce key concepts! Cophiesollins (discuss • contribs) 05:52, 4 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I'm a fan of this chapter! My only real critique is the text under heading "The impact of Machiavellianism in the workplace" is a little long without something breaking it up in the middle. Maybe a case study in the middle could break it up? U3249300 (discuss • contribs) 09:45, 5 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 27 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is an excellent chapter. It successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
The main area for potential improvement is aspects of the quality of written expression
For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits
Engages reader via an excellent case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image, although a picture of a workplace might work better to help attract reader interest
Overall, the quality of written expression is very good
Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes
Very good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example.
No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Good use of image(s)
Very good use of table(s)
Very good use of feature box(es)
Excellent use of case studies or examples
Very good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s)
Very good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section
Very good use of external links in the "External links" section
Latest comment: 14 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
The chapter sub-title but not the chapter title is used in the name of the presentation. This would help to convey the purpose of the presentation and be consistent.
A good written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided (maybe because the YouTube user account doesn't have advanced features)
A link from the book chapter is provided
The presentation is incorrectly categorised as being for kids. This creates limitations, such as being unable to add the presentation to a playlist. More info.