Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Dopamine and social behaviour

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

neurotypical vs neurodivergent

[edit source]

Hey Deen, super interesting topic (and page!)

Food for thought, have you looked at/is there any research regarding how dopamine effects social behaviour between neurotypical people and neurodivergent people? Could be interesting to look into since nurodivergent people (specially ADHD) tend to have a dopamine deficiency. U3173387 (discusscontribs) 14:50, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title is correctly worded and formatted
  1. Promising 3-level heading structure – could benefit from further development (e.g.., "interaction" repeated e.g,. what role does dopamine in social interaction)
  2. I like the focus on dysfunction - that could be one way to go - i.e., how does D facilitate functional/dysfunctional social interactions
  3. Remove notes from headings
  4. Consider adopting closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  1. Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions
  2. A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section
  3. Add an image to the scenario or case study to help attract reader interest
  4. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided
  5. Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended
  1. Key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations
  2. For sections which include sub-sections, include the key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
  3. Good balance of theory and research
  4. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Underway
  1. A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited
  2. Citation of figures should refer to "Figure X" rather than "figure X" (APA style)
  3. Consider increasing image size from to make it easier to view
  1. Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies)
  3. Promising use of table(s)
  4. Consider including more examples/case studies, quiz question(s) etc.
  1. Excellent
  2. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
  1. See also
    1. Excellent
  2. External links
    1. Excellent
  1. Excellent – used effectively
  2. Excellent description about self provided
  3. Link(s) provided to professional profile(s)
  4. Link provided to book chapter
  1. Good – two out of three types of contributions made with with direct link(s) to evidence
  2. Also consider making direct improvements to other book chapters (past or current)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:36, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply