Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2022/Kindness and gratitude

Peer-reviewed references to look at

Hi,

I have found some references through the UC library that may be of use in developing this chapter.

Cox, J., Nguyen, T., & Kang, S. M. (2018). The Kindness of Strangers? An Investigation into the Interaction of Funder Motivations in Online Crowdfunding Campaigns. Kyklos (Basel), 71(2), 187–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12167

Kirby, J. N., Gerrish, R., Sherwell, C., & Gilbert, P. (2022). The Role of Likeability in Discriminating Between Kindness and Compassion. Mindfulness, 13(6), 1555–1564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-022-01900-z

Cotney, J. L., & Banerjee, R. (2019). Adolescents’ Conceptualizations of Kindness and its Links with Well-being: A Focus Group Study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(2), 599–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517738584

Otake, K., Shimai, S., Tanaka-Matsumi, J., Otsui, K., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2006). HAPPY PEOPLE BECOME HAPPIER THROUGH KINDNESS: A COUNTING KINDNESSES INTERVENTION. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(3), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-005-3650-z

U3216256 (discuss • contribs) 00:15, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for that! U3205429 (discuss • contribs) 02:23, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Subtopic suggetions

Perhaps you should mention the types motivation- Explicit, implicit motivation. You can find information on the Motivation and Emotion Module. CNK.20 (discuss • contribs) 10:45, 24 August 2022 (UisTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to see editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments below may also be about all material on the page at the time of providing this feedback.

Title The title is correctly worded The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted The wording and/or capitalisation of the title is incorrect. Be consistent with the book table of contents. The wording of the sub-title is incorrect. Be consistent with the book table of contents. User page Excellent – used effectively Description about self provided Link(s) provided to professional profile(s) Link provided to book chapter Social contribution Right idea However, these edits introduced several new grammatical errors, so should be fixed. Take note of how to use ownership apostrophes. Headings The headings do not adequately address the topic: "Kindness motivation - What motivates kindness?" Key points The key points do not adequately address the topic: "Kindness motivation - What motivates kindness?" Figure A relevant figure is presented Cite each figure at least once in the main text References These references only partially address the topic of what motivates kindness. For APA referencing style, check and correct: alphabetical order capitalisation italicisation doi formatting page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Resources See also Excellent Also link to related book chapters Not developed External links Excellent

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:16, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Altruism

Hi,

Perhaps you might benefit from looking at altruism and its relationship to kindness. This source looks at the Kitty Genovese case to elaborate on helping behaviour and altruism as a motivator for kindness. Hope this helps :)

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4613-3997-7_6 U3210431 (discuss • contribs) 23:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a reasonably good presentation Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed and narrated — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. The font sizes are very small and somewhat difficult to read on this background. Consider ways to improve readability. Briefly explain why this topic is important Brief focus questions are presented Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little Isn't the wallet scenario an example of kindness rather than gratitude? The presentation is well structured (i.e., Overview, Content, Conclusion) The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes good use of relevant psychological research Check and correct grammar (e.g., that vs who) The presentation includes citations The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion A Conclusion is presented with useful take-home message(s) Audio The presentation uses narrated audio The audio is hard to follow because so much content is presented so quickly Consider slowing down and leaving longer pauses between sentences. This can help the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point Consider using greater intonation to enhance listener interest and engagement Audio recording quality was excellent Video Overall, visual display quality is good The presentation makes good use of text and image based slides Some of the font size should be larger to make it easier to read Consider using a sans-serif typeface to make the text easier to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools Meta-data The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding. A link to the book chapter is provided but the hyperlink isn't active to allow 1-click access A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are not provided. Either provide details about the image sources and their copyright licenses in the presentation description or remove the presentation. A copyright license for the presentation is not provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:40, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a basic, but sufficient chapter Well under the maximum word count, so there is room to expand For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Basic Overview Briefly explains the problem or phenomenon Consider introducing a case study or example or using an image to help engage reader interest Add focus questions in a feature box to help guide the reader and structure the chapter Theory – Breadth Basic but sufficient coverage of relevant theory Overly focused on definitions; summarise and move to the more substantive aspects of theory Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters) Theory – Depth Reasonably good depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) No use of tables and/or lists are to help clearly convey key theoretical information Basic use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research – Key findings Reasonably good review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Greater emphasis on effect sizes, major reviews, and/or meta-analyses would be helpful Research – Critical thinking Good critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Claims are referenced Integration Reasonably good integration between theory and research Conclusion Basic summary and conclusion Add practical, take-home message(s) Written expression – Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is basic Use active (e.g., "this chapter explored") rather than passive voice (e.g., "this chapter has explored" or "this chapter will explore") [1][2] "People" is often a better term than "individuals" Layout Include an introductory paragraph before branching into the sub-sections (see tags) Avoid having sections with 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings Grammar The grammar for some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags). Grammar-checking tools are available in most internet browsers and word processing software packages.[3] Another option is to share draft work with peers and ask for their assistance. Check and correct use of that vs. who Check and make correct use of commas] Abbreviations Only use abbreviations (such as e.g., i.e., et al., etc.) inside parentheses APA style Direct quotes need page numbers – even better, write in your own words Figures Figures are very well captioned Figure captions use the correct format Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., do not use italics, check and correct capitalisation) Citations are not in full APA style (7th ed.). For example: List multiple citations in alphabetical order by first author surname References are not in full APA style. For example: Check and correct use of capitalisation[4] Check and correct use of italicisation Separate page numbers using an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Written expression – Learning features Good use of learning features Basic use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example. No use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive. See example. Basic use of image(s) No use of table(s) Basic use of feature box(es) Good use of case studies or examples Excellent use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Move external links to the external link section Very good use of external links in the "External links" section Use sentence casing Social contribution ~3 logged, useful, minor to moderate social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:38, 18 November 2022 (UTC)