This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn Canvas, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Some relevant research is discussed in relation to theory. This could be more indepth.
The case studies are based on research studies, which adds depth. However, this means that there are no case studies of real world examples (e.g., entrepreneurship stories of success and failure which illustrate theories in action).
When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
Greater emphasis on major reviews and/or meta-analyses would be helpful.
Some claims are unreferenced (e.g., see the [factual?] tags).
Overall, the quality of written expression is good.
Internationalise: Write for an international, not just a domestic audience (e.g., see External links).
Obtaining (earlier) comments on a chapter plan and/or chapter draft could have helped to improve the chapter.
Layout
Sections which include sub-sections should also include an introductory paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections.
Learning features
No use of embedded interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text more interactive.
No use of embedded links to related book chapters. Embedding links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
Very good use of images.
No use of tables.
Basic use of feature boxes.
Good use of quizzes.
Very good use of case studies or examples.
Use bullet-points for See also and External links, per Tutorial 1.
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Canvas site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
The content is quite comprehensive and well selected.
A case study could be helpful.
Note that an entrepreneur doesn't necessarily start a "business" (e.g., social entrepreneurs). So, motives may also include social and/or environmental goals, not just self-benefit.
"More likely" is relative; so, "more likely" than who?
The presentation is well structured.
The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages.
