Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2019/Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and long-term goal pursuit

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search


The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title and sub-title[edit source]

  1. Excellent

User page[edit source]

  1. Created, with description about self and link to book chapter

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. Summarised with indirect links to evidence.
  2. Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.

Section headings[edit source]

  1. Well developed 2-level heading structure, with meaningful headings that directly relate to the core topic.
  2. Sections which include sub-sections should also include an overview paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.

Key points[edit source]

  1. Overview - Consider adding focus questions.
  2. Key points are well developed for each section, with relevant citations.
  3. Consider embedding one quiz question per major section.

Image[edit source]

  1. An image (figure) is presented.
  2. Caption uses APA style.
  3. Caption explains how the image connects to key points being made in the main text.

References[edit source]

  1. Excellent

Resources[edit source]

  1. See also
    1. Provide more specific links to related chapters and/or Wikipedia articles
    2. Also link to past relevant chapters
  2. External links
    1. Use bullet-points
    2. Provide about source in brackets after link

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:37, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant 2017 Book Chapter[edit source]

You may want to link to 'tDCS and motivation' has a section on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and talks about it's influence on long-term goals --U3176966 (discusscontribs) 12:59, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn Canvas, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to address a specific question.
  2. Overview - useful, engaging example. Consider adding focus questions.
  3. Conclusion - well considered, balance, insightful.
  4. For additional feedback, see comments below and these copyedits.

Theory[edit source]

  1. Regions of the brain are well explained, drilling down to the DLPFC
  2. Excellent understanding of the function of different brain regions demonstrated, with easy to understand explanations.
  3. Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained.

Research[edit source]

  1. Relevant research is well reviewed and critically discussed in relation to theory.

Written expression[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. Overall, the chapter is very well written.
    2. The chapter benefited from a well developed Overview and Conclusion, with clear focus question(s) and take-home messages.
  2. Layout
    1. Avoid having sections with only one sub-section.
  3. Learning features
    1. For numbered lists, use Wikiversity formatting per Tutorial 1.
    2. See also and External links - use bullet-points per Tutorial 1 and indicate source in parentheses
    3. Excellent use of interwiki links and embedded links to other book chapters.
    4. Embedding interwiki links links to other book chapters would help to integrate this chapter into the broader book project.
    5. The opening case study isn't followed up or developed further during the chapter.
    6. Basic use of images.
    7. Basic use of tables - there is not really info in Table 1 to justify it.
    8. Basic use of feature boxes - adjust width.
    9. Excellent use of quizzes.
  4. Spelling, grammar, and proofreading is excellent.
  5. APA style
    1. Refer to each Table and each Figure at least once within the main text.
    2. Citations are not in full APA style. For example:
      1. In-text citations should be in alphabetical order.
    3. References are not in full APA style. For example:
      1. Book publisher details needed.
      2. Check and correct use of capitalisation.
      3. See new doi format.

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. ~2 logged social contributions without direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:18, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Canvas site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a basic presentation.
  2. This presentation makes effective use of simple tools.

Structure and content[edit source]

  1. Well selected content - not too much or too little.
  2. What is the DLFC?
  3. The presentation is well structured.
  4. Add an Overview slide (e.g., with focus questions), to help orientate the viewer about what will be covered.
  5. A Conclusion slide is presented. What are the practical take-home message(s) that we can use to help improve our everyday lives?

Communication[edit source]

  1. The presentation makes use of largely text based slides with narrated audio.
  2. Well paced.
  3. The font size is generally sufficiently large to make it easy to read.
  4. The visual communication could be improved by including some relevant images.

Production quality[edit source]

  1. Communicate the chapter title and sub-title in both the video title and on the opening slide this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. Audio recording quality was good.
  3. Visual display quality was good.
  4. A copyright license for the presentation is provided.
  5. A link to the book chapter is provided.
  6. A link from the book chapter is provided.
  7. A brief written description of the presentation is provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:33, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]