The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
Have a read of Robins and Novaco (1999) on systems conceptualisation and treatment of anger. Page 327, the researchers talk about how interrelatedness of system components provide positive or negative feedback among interdependent structures, which could either amplify or counteract anger processes. They also discuss some assumptions of anger and provide some clear examples.
--U3158296 (discuss • contribs) 07:13, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
Consider introducing more information into your overview, as expanding this can provide clarification towards the aims and target of your textbook chapter. Providing a case study in this section reflecting the experience of a person anger management difficulties could be beneficial. Otherwise, your work thus far appears to be well-developed, and the information provided is interesting to the viewer! Good work and good luck! --Emilymking (discuss • contribs) 23:23, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn Canvas, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Relevant research is well reviewed and discussed in relation to theory.
When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
Greater emphasis on major reviews and meta-analyses would be helpful.