The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
Basic, 2-level heading structure - could benefit from further development e.g., to reduce the number of top-level headings increase the number of subsequent-level headings.
Sections which include sub-sections should also include an overview paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
Consider more interesting headings than "relevant theories"
Have a read of Robins and Novaco (1999) on systems conceptualisation and treatment of anger. Page 327, the researchers talk about how interrelatedness of system components provide positive or negative feedback among interdependent structures, which could either amplify or counteract anger processes. They also discuss some assumptions of anger and provide some clear examples.
--U3158296 (discuss • contribs) 07:13, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Consider introducing more information into your overview, as expanding this can provide clarification towards the aims and target of your textbook chapter. Providing a case study in this section reflecting the experience of a person anger management difficulties could be beneficial. Otherwise, your work thus far appears to be well-developed, and the information provided is interesting to the viewer! Good work and good luck! --Emilymking (discuss • contribs) 23:23, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via UCLearn Canvas, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
Overview needs development (introduce the topic). The case study and focus questions are excellent.
Excellent Conclusion.
For additional feedback, see comments below and these copyedits.
Relevant research is well reviewed and discussed in relation to theory.
When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
Greater emphasis on major reviews and meta-analyses would be helpful.
The chapter benefited from a well developed Overview and Conclusion, with clear focus question(s) and take-home messages.
The chapter would benefit from a more developed Overview and Conclusion, with clearer focus question(s) (Overview) and take-home self-help message for each focus question (Conclusion).
Sections which include sub-sections should also include an introductory paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
Learning features
Excellent use of interwiki links and embedded links to related book chapters.
Good use of images.
No use of tables.
Good use of feature boxes.
Good use of quizzes.
The quiz questions could be more effective as learning prompts by being embedded as single questions within each corresponding section rather than being presented as a set of questions at the end.
Check and correct use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., individuals vs. individual's).
APA style
Refer to each Table and each Figure at least once within the main text.
Citations are not in full APA style. For example:
When there are three or more authors, subsequent citations should use et al. e.g., Smith, Bush and Western (2001) and thereafter cite Smith et al. (2001).
In-text citations should be in alphabetical order.
References are not in full APA style. For example:
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Canvas site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
Communicate the chapter title and sub-title in both the video title and on the opening slide this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
Audio recording quality was very good except for the distracting music.
Mute the music during narration to help the viewer concentrate on the combination of visual information and narrated audio.
Video recording quality was excellent/very good/good/basic.
Image sources are acknowledged.
A copyright license for the presentation is provided.
A link to the book chapter is provided.
A link from the book chapter is provided.
A brief written description of the presentation is provided.
