Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2018/Self-concordance theory and motivation

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via Canvas. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Autoroute icone.svg

Title, sub-title, TOC[edit]

  1. Excellent

User page[edit]

  1. Excellent

Social contribution[edit]

  1. Fantastic

Section headings[edit]

  1. Excellent, 2-level structure that clearly reflects the topic

Key points[edit]

  1. Overall, very well researched and prepared.
  2. Overview - excellent
  3. APA style: When citing multiple sources, put them in alphabetical order
  4. SDT could be covered more briefly, linking out to relevant dedicated sources; focus instead on how SDT relates to SCT - so, maybe, start with SCT and briefly summarise SDT within that
  5. Conclusion - expand - this is the most important section.
  6. Consider using other examples.

Image[edit]

  1. Excellent

References[edit]

  1. Good
  2. Use APA style
  3. For latest APA style recommended format for dois see http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2017/03/doi-display-guidelines-update-march-2017.html

Resources[edit]

  1. Very good
  2. See also - also link to other related Wikiversity book chapters

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:53, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Dissonance[edit]

I suggest linking to and collaborating with the chapter on Motivation and emotion/Book/2018/Cognitive dissonance and emotion. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:27, 16 October 2018 (UTC)


Chapter review and feedback[edit]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Wikiuutiset logo typewriter.png

Overall[edit]

  1. Overall, this is a top-notch chapter that successfully exhibits all the requirements, including effective use of psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world problem.
  2. For additional feedback, see comments below and these copyedits.

Theory[edit]

  1. Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained in an interesting, in-depth, yet accessible manner.
  2. Excellent synthesis and integration with research.

Research[edit]

  1. Excellent understanding of relevant research is demonstrated, with integration with theory.

Written expression[edit]

  1. Written expression
    1. This chapter is particularly well written. The high standard of professional writing demonstrates capacity to excel at post-graduate level and professional work.
  2. Layout
    1. The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections.
    2. Sections which include sub-sections should also include an introductory paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
  3. Learning features
    1. Effective use if made of Interwiki links, images, quiz etc.
  4. Spelling, grammar, APA style etc. are all excellent.


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Canvas site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Multimedia.png

Overall[edit]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent presentation that makes effective use of simple tools.

Structure and content[edit]

  1. Well selected and structured content - not too much or too little.
  2. Perhaps work on more practical take-away messages for the Conclusion.
  3. Include the sub-title.

Communication[edit]

  1. The presentation is interesting to watch and listen to.
  2. The presentation makes effective use of narrated text and image based slides with narrated audio.
  3. Consider using more examples.
  4. Theory is well covered.
  5. Key research evidence should also be mentioned.
  6. Well paced.

Production quality[edit]

  1. Audio and video recording quality was excellent.
  2. Audio recording quality had some minor blips/distortions and keyboard sound at the end - review microphone set up.
  3. Copyright is clearly acknowledged.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:20, 14 November 2018 (UTC)