Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2018/Live stream viewing motivation

Comments

I have added the template to your page, to make it a little bit easier to create, and help you get a nice flow! --U3158984 (discuss • contribs) 21:15, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi! I found a study that looks at social motivation of engaging in live streaming, I will put the reference here in case you are interested or have not already found it: Hilvert-Bruce, Z., Neill, J., Sjöblom, M., & Hamari, J. (2018). Social motivations of live-streaming viewer engagement on Twitch. Computers In Human Behavior, 84, 58-67. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.013 My boyfriend just started streaming and said the main reason was to make more friends who play the game. --Yasmin Dinneen (discuss • contribs) 22:16, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title, sub-title, TOC Not added User page Nothing added Social contribution Nothing summarised Section headings No development Key points No development Image Nothing added References Nothing added Resources Nothing added

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 12:23, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Heading casing

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings (or sentence casing). For example, use: ==Cats and dogs== rather than ==Cats and Dogs== -- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:47, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a promising, reasonably good chapter. One area for potential improvement is to add a Conclusion with take-home messages. For additional feedback, see comments below and [ these copyedits]. Theory Relevant theories are well selected, described, and integrated with research. Some statements are unreferenced (e.g., see the tags). Research Relevant research is discussed. To improve, describe relevant studies and their findings in more detail. Written expression Written expression is generally very good. Layout The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections. See earlier comments about heading casing. Learning features Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words would make the text more interactive. No use of images, tables, case studies, quizzes, or feature boxes. APA style Citations are not in full APA style e.g., A serial comma is needed before "&" or "and" for citations involving three or more authors. Multiple citations within parentheses should be separated by a semi-colon. In-text citations should be in alphabetical order. References use correct APA style. References are not in full APA style e.g., See new doi format.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:47, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Canvas site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a very good presentation that makes effective use of real examples. Structure and content Well selected and structured content - not too much or too little. The presentation is well structured (Title, Overview, Body, Conclusion). More coverage about research could help to improve the depth of the presentation. Live demonstration examples are excellent. Add and narrate a Title slide, to help the viewer understanding the focus and goal of the presentation. Add and narrate an Overview slide, to help orientate the viewer about what will be covered. The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages. Communication The presentation is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to watch and listen to. Well paced. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point. Visual communication is very good. Title, Overview, and Conclusion slides are not presented. Production quality Use the full chapter title and sub-title on the opening slide and in the name of the video because this helps to match the book chapter and to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Audio and video recording quality was excellent. No acknowledgement of image sources. A copyright license for the presentation is not provided. A link to the book chapter is provided. No written description of the presentation is provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:55, 29 November 2018 (UTC)