Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2018/Fecal disgust

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Article suggestion[edit source]

Hi there, what an interesting topic! I have found this article on coprophilia that may assist you with developing that section http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=435b5c93-a4b1-4675-bc95-c69b965fc819%40pdc-v-sessmgr01&bdata=#db=pbh&AN=116750686 Good luck with the chapter! --U3160212 (discusscontribs) 02:50, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Heading casing[edit source]

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings. For example, use:

==Cats and dogs==

rather than

==Cats and Dogs==

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:17, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title, sub-title, TOC[edit source]

  1. Not provided; now added

User page[edit source]

  1. Excellent

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. Excellent

Section headings[edit source]

  1. Simple structure proposed - focused on topic
  2. Avoid having sections with only one subsection - either have no subsections or two or more subsections
  3. For the main sections, consider possible use of sub-sections

Key points[edit source]

  1. Some useful key point development, with citations
  2. Overall, the proposed material is very relevant to the topic
  3. Overview and Conclusion - underdeveloped - these are the most important sections

Image[edit source]

  1. Expand caption to connect to key points being made in text - e.g., maybe ask a reader to consider - do we find an emoji more acceptable / less disgusting than the real thing or even a photo?

References[edit source]

  1. Very good
  2. Use APA style
  3. For latest APA style recommended format for dois see http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2017/03/doi-display-guidelines-update-march-2017.html

Resources[edit source]

  1. Use bullet points
  2. Rename links and include more info in brackets afterwards
  3. See also
    1. See internal links
  4. External links
    1. See external links
    2. Include info about source/destination in brackets after the hyperlink - see example

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:40, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Chapter review and feedback[edit source]

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a very good chapter that successfully uses psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world phenomenon or problem.
  2. For additional feedback, see comments below and these copyedits.

Theory[edit source]

  1. Relevant theories are well selected, described, and explained, in a balanced way, with examples.

Research[edit source]

  1. Relevant research is well reviewed and discussed in relation to theory.
  2. When describing important research findings, consider including a bit more detail about the methodology and indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.

Written expression[edit source]

  1. Written expression is generally very good.
    1. Abbreviations (such as e.g., i.e.., etc.) should only be used inside parentheses.
  2. Layout
    1. The chapter is well structured, with major sections using sub-sections.
  3. Learning features
    1. Use in-text interwiki links, rather than external links.
    2. Use bullet-points for "See also" and "External links"
    3. Basic use of images.
    4. No use of tables.
    5. No use of feature boxes.
    6. Good use of quizzes.
    7. Good use of examples.
  4. Grammar
    1. Use serial commas.
    2. Check and make correct use of that vs. who.
    3. Check and make correct use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., individuals vs. individual's).
  5. Spelling
    1. Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour).
  6. APA style
    1. Refer to each Table and each Figure at least once within the main text.
    2. Provide more detailed Figure captions to help connect the figure to the text.
    3. Citations are not in full APA style e.g.,
      1. A serial comma is needed before "&" or "and" for citations involving three or more authors.
    4. References are not in full APA style e.g.,
      1. Check and make correct use of italicisation.
      2. Do not include issue numbers for journals which are continuously numbered within volumes.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:03, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Canvas site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent (top-notch) presentation that makes effective use of Powtoon.

Structure and content[edit source]

  1. Well selected and structured content - not too much or too little.
  2. The presentation is well structured (Title, Overview, Body, Conclusion).

Communication[edit source]

  1. The presentation is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to watch and listen to.
  2. The presentation makes effective use of Powtoon video, text and image based slides with narrated audio.
  3. Well paced. Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
  4. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read in the time provided.
  5. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and video.

Production quality[edit source]

  1. The full chapter title and sub-title are used in the video title - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  2. The full chapter title and sub-title are used on the opening slide - this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  3. Audio and video recording quality was excellent.
  4. A copyright license for the presentation is provided.
  5. A link to and from the book chapter is provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 22:10, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]