Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2018/Affective computing

Topic development feedback

The topic development has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.

Title, sub-title, TOC Excellent User page Very good Social contribution Links don't go directly to evidence of contributions See suggestions for how to record social contributions Section headings Simple, 2-level structure proposed - this is fine, but perhaps consider whether the largest section(s) could benefit from being structured into sub-sections Theories section looks to be about research? Key points Some development, but mostly in the form of questions Key points don't include any citations Conclusion is underdeveloped - this is the most important section Image OK Maybe explain the image in more detail - it is not immediately apparent how this image is depicting affective computing References OK Use APA style For latest APA style recommended format for dois see http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2017/03/doi-display-guidelines-update-march-2017.html Resources See als0 Use internal links Also include links to related Wikiversity book chapters External links None included (what was included were Wikipedia links - these have been moved to See also)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:08, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a basic chapter. Overview - consider adding focus questions Too much generic material; not enough focus on theory/research specific to the topic. Demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic. For additional feedback, see comments below and these copyedits. Theory Basic theory is considered, but there is too much general material and it is too much based on secondary rather than primary sources. Reeve and other textbooks are overused as citations - instead, consult and utilise primary, peer-reviewed sources. Research Basic coverage of research involving the relation between the target constructs is provided. Written expression Written expression Use third person perspective (rather than second person). Layout Use default Wikiversity heading formatting (rather than manually bolding and insetting). This will list the section headings in the Contents. Learning features Use in-text interwiki links, rather than external links.## Add bullet-points to external links Interwiki links are well used. Adding interwiki links for the first mention of key words would make the text more interactive. Limited use of images. No use of tables. Basic use of quizzes. Some use of case studies or examples. Spelling, grammar, and proofreading. The grammar for some sentences could be improved. Check and correct use of commas. More proofreading is needed to fix typos (e.g., unnecessary capitalisation) and bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard. APA style Direct quotes need page numbers. Citations APA style not used (e.g., correct capitalisation). In-text citations should be in alphabetical order.

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Canvas site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic sufficient presentation. The presentation is over the maximum time limit. Structure and content Autism wasn't covered in the book chapter? Too much detail, not enough big picture focus questions and synthesis of relevant theory/research. Add and narrate an Overview slide, to help orientate the viewer about what will be covered. The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages. Communication The presentation makes basic use of text and based slides with narrated audio. Some of the font size should be larger to make it easier to read. The visual communication could be improved by including some relevant images. Production quality Hide the screencastify recording bar A copyright license for the presentation is provided - but the license statements are inconsistent. Use the full chapter title and sub-title on the opening slide and in the name of the video because this helps to match the book chapter and to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Audio and video recording quality were good. A link to and from the book chapter is provided.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:48, 17 November 2018 (UTC)