Heading casing [ edit ]
FYI, the convention on
Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings. For example, use:
==Cats and dogs==
==Cats and Dogs==
-- Jtneill - 09:39, 12 October 2017 (UTC) Talk - c
The topic development has been reviewed according to the
marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by and/or contacting the starting a new section below reviewer. Topic development marks will be available later via Moodle. Keep an eye on Announcements. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date, whereas the comments may also be based on all material available at time of providing this feedback.
Title, sub-title, TOC [ edit ]
User page [ edit ]
Created, but minimal
Social contribution [ edit ]
None logged on user page
Section headings [ edit ]
See earlier comment about capitalisation of headings
Consider using sub-headings e.g., in the "Reactance" section
Key points [ edit ]
Well thought through, including theory, research, and practical example
Very good; consider expanding image size
References [ edit ]
Wide range, but not in full APA style e.g., provide full name of journal, use of italics, use the new recommended format for dois -
http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2014/07/how-to-use-the-new-doi-format-in-apa-style.html, do not include issue numbers for journals which are continuously numbered within a volume, etc.
Resources [ edit ]
Rename the links
Jtneill - 09:39, 12 October 2017 (UTC) Talk - c
Overall [ edit ]
Overall, this is an excellent chapter that successfully weaves psychological theory and research to help address a practical, real-world problem.
For additional feedback, see
Theories were well described and explained, with lots of examples.
The Conclusion could offer some more specific take-home messages.
Good coverage of a wide range of relevant research in many different applied areas.
When describing important research findings, indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
Some statements were unreferenced - see the
The chapter is over the maximum word count.
Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences.
See earlier comments about
heading casing Sub-headings have been added.
The chapter is well structured.
Sections which include sub-sections should also include an introductory paragraph (which doesn't need a separate heading) before branching into the sub-headings.
interwiki links would make the text more interactive. Basic use of images.
No use of tables.
Basic use of quizzes.
Spelling, grammar, and proofreading
Use Australian spelling - e.g., hypothesize -> hypothesise
A full-stop is needed after et al.
References are not in full APA style e.g.,
Check and correct alphabetical order
Check and correct full journal names
Check and correct italicisation
new doi format Do not include issue numbers for journals which are continuously numbered within volumes.
Overall [ edit ]
Overall, this is well executed presentation.
Well selected and structured content - not too much or too little.
Narrate the Title and Sub-title.
Good example questions in the Overview. Also outline what the presentation will cover.
The presentation could be strengthened by adding a Conclusion slide with practical, take-home messages.
Citations and references?
The presentation is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to watch and listen to.
Use the full chapter title and sub-title in the name of the video because this helps to match the book chapter and to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
Audio and video recording quality was excellent.
Jtneill - 05:16, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Talk - c