Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2015/Climate change and mental health

From Wikiversity
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Jtneill in topic Multimedia feedback
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Reference

[edit source]

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00038-009-0112-0 -- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:11, 21 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hey! Great chapter, well done! There are some excellent external links there. Have you considered adding some internal wiki links under the heading 'See also'?. This is where you could put some links to climate change (natural disasters, drought etc), mental health, and Maslow's Hierarchy of needs.

Heading casing

[edit source]
FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings. For example, use:

==Cats and dogs==

rather than

==Cats and Dogs==

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply


Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall

[edit source]
  1. Overall, this is a very good chapter.
  2. For more feedback see these copyedits and the comments below.
  1. The ways in which climate change can affect mental health are well covered.
  2. It seemed a bit unnecessary/odd to tack Maslow's hierarchy of needs in at the end.
  3. Beef up the Conclusion - it need to summarise the key points and provide practical, take-away messages about how the problem can be tackled.
  4. More case studies could be helpful.
  1. Research is reasonably well covered, but describing some key studies in more detail could help to add depth to this aspect of the chapter.
  2. Some statements were unreferenced (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)
  3. When describing important research studies, provide some indication of the nature of the sample and possibly cultural context.
  4. When discussing important research findings, indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
  1. Written expression is generally very good.
    1. Avoid sections with only one sub-section. A section should have no sub-sections or at least two sub-sections.
    2. Many paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences.
  2. Layout
    1. Add bullet-points for See also and External links.
    2. See earlier comments about heading casing
    3. Minimal use is made of Tables and/or Figures.
  3. Learning features
    1. Interwiki links could be added (e.g., to relevant Wikipedia articles and other Wikiversity book chapters) to make the text more interactive.
    2. Quiz questions are used effectively to encourage reader engagement.
  4. Spelling
    1. Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize -> hypothesise).
  5. Grammar and proofreading
    1. Check and correct the use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., individuals vs. individual's vs. individuals').
  6. APA style
    1. Add APA style captions to tables and figures.
    2. The reference list is not in full APA style.
    3. Put in-text citations in alphabetical order.
    4. Direct quotes need page numbers.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall

[edit source]
  1. Overall, this is a basic, but sufficient presentation.
  1. The presentation provides a reasonable overview of the topic.
  2. Include citations to evidence for claims.
  3. Consider incorporating more explanatory text and/or images/diagrams to help convey the concepts in the narration.
  4. What are the practical, take-home messages?
  1. Audio is clear and well-paced.
  2. Visuals are simple, clear and easy to read.
  1. A link to the presentation is not provided from book chapter (a link has now been added).
  2. Audio is cut-off on some slides (e.g., Natural disasters) and there was no audio for at least one slide.
  3. Conclusion slide was empty?
  4. Fill out the description field (e.g., brief description of presentation, link back to the book chapter, license details, and possibly include references and image attributions).
  5. A copyright license for the presentation is not indicated (i.e., in the description or in the presentation slides).
  6. No link is provided back to the book chapter.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)Reply