Wikidebate
(Redirected from Public Policy Debate)
Wikidebate is a collaborative learning project to gather and organize all arguments on controversial issues. It's not a place to defend your preferred points of view, but original arguments are allowed and welcome.
Recent changes
[edit | edit source]List of abbreviations:
- D
- Wikidata edit
- N
- This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
- m
- This is a minor edit
- b
- This edit was performed by a bot
- (±123)
- The page size changed by this number of bytes
18 September 2024
| 04:47 | Is Wikiversity a project worth having? diffhist +63 Dan Polansky discuss contribs (+"and the time and efforts of the volunteers, who are rather few") | ||||
17 September 2024
|
|
21:14 | Are wikidebates a good thing? 4 changes history +102 [Dan Polansky; Prototyperspective (3×)] | |||
|
|
21:14 (cur | prev) +85 Prototyperspective discuss contribs (→Wikidebates are a good thing: Edit argument against #DebateTools) | ||||
|
|
21:11 (cur | prev) +17 Prototyperspective discuss contribs (→Wikidebates are a good thing: Edit argument against #DebateTools) | ||||
|
|
16:41 (cur | prev) −339 Prototyperspective discuss contribs (rv (Undo revision 2652891 by Dan Polansky as stated, it does have prior publication peer-review by default: claims don't show up until an admin of the debate accepted it which can take a while and some back and forth + editing)) Tag: Undo | ||||
|
|
08:16 (cur | prev) +339 Dan Polansky discuss contribs Tag: Reverted | ||||
|
|
16:43 | Should we use nuclear energy? 2 changes history +280 [Prototyperspective (2×)] | |||
|
|
16:43 (cur | prev) +111 Prototyperspective discuss contribs (→We should use nuclear energy: Add objection #DebateTools) | ||||
|
|
16:42 (cur | prev) +169 Prototyperspective discuss contribs (→We should use nuclear energy: Add objection #DebateTools) | ||||
| 16:39 | Does free-as-in-freedom software endanger proprietary software? diffhist +192 Prototyperspective discuss contribs (→Free-as-in-freedom software endangers proprietary software: Add objection #DebateTools) | ||||
|
|
09:07 | Should the monarchy in the UK be abolished? 2 changes history 0 [Jtneill; 87.78.73.120] | |||
| m |
|
09:07 (cur | prev) −3 Jtneill discuss contribs (Reverted edits by 87.78.73.120 (talk) to last version by QwertyForest using rollback) Tag: Rollback | |||
|
|
07:36 (cur | prev) +3 87.78.73.120 discuss (→Arguments for: Edit objection for #DebateTools) Tag: Reverted | ||||
16 September 2024
|
|
16:25 | Does free-as-in-freedom software endanger proprietary software? 2 changes history +405 [Tosha Langue; Dan Polansky] | |||
|
|
16:25 (cur | prev) +273 Tosha Langue discuss contribs (→Free-as-in-freedom software endangers proprietary software: Add objection #DebateTools) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||||
|
|
11:27 (cur | prev) +132 Dan Polansky discuss contribs (→Free-as-in-freedom software endangers proprietary software: +"That reads as an advocacy for free software rather than support for the notion that endagerement actually happens.") | ||||
|
|
15:47 | Is homosexuality a disorder? 5 changes history +1,046 [Tosha Langue (5×)] | |||
|
|
15:47 (cur | prev) +101 Tosha Langue discuss contribs (→Homosexuality is a disorder: Add objection #DebateTools) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||||
|
|
15:45 (cur | prev) +290 Tosha Langue discuss contribs (→Homosexuality is a disorder: Add objection #DebateTools) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||||
|
|
15:26 (cur | prev) +104 Tosha Langue discuss contribs (→Homosexuality is a disorder: Add objection #DebateTools) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||||
|
|
15:24 (cur | prev) +30 Tosha Langue discuss contribs (Added reflist) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||||
|
|
15:22 (cur | prev) +521 Tosha Langue discuss contribs (→Homosexuality is a disorder: Add argument for #DebateTools) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||||
|
|
02:05 | Does objective reality exist? 2 changes history −2 [120.22.111.56 (2×)] | |||
|
|
02:05 (cur | prev) +2 120.22.111.56 discuss (→Objective reality exists: Edit objection for #DebateTools) | ||||
|
|
02:05 (cur | prev) −4 120.22.111.56 discuss (→Objective reality exists: Edit objection for #DebateTools) | ||||
15 September 2024
|
|
22:15 | Should Mill's harm principle be accepted? 3 changes history +468 [176.0.152.191 (3×)] | |||
|
|
22:15 (cur | prev) +204 176.0.152.191 discuss (→Arguments against: Add objection #DebateTools) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||||
|
|
22:04 (cur | prev) +9 176.0.152.191 discuss (→Arguments against: Edit objection against #DebateTools) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||||
|
|
22:04 (cur | prev) +255 176.0.152.191 discuss (→Arguments against: Add objection #DebateTools) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||||
|
|
21:47 | Should we use nuclear energy? 2 changes history +394 [176.0.152.191 (2×)] | |||
|
|
21:47 (cur | prev) +251 176.0.152.191 discuss (→We should use nuclear energy: Add argument against #DebateTools) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||||
|
|
21:36 (cur | prev) +143 176.0.152.191 discuss (→We should use nuclear energy: Add objection #DebateTools) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||||
|
|
21:25 | Should suicide be legal? 2 changes history 0 [Koavf; 176.0.152.191] | |||
| m |
|
21:25 (cur | prev) −71 Koavf discuss contribs (Reverted edits by 176.0.152.191 (talk) to last version by S. Perquin using rollback) Tag: Rollback | |||
|
|
21:23 (cur | prev) +71 176.0.152.191 discuss (→Suicide should be legal: Add argument against #DebateTools) Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||||
|
|
21:05 | Is there intelligent extraterrestrial life in the Milky Way? 2 changes history +809 [176.0.152.191 (2×)] | |||
|
|
21:05 (cur | prev) +78 176.0.152.191 discuss (→There is no evidence for either side of the argument: Add objection #DebateTools) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||||
|
|
20:58 (cur | prev) +731 176.0.152.191 discuss (→Arguments against: Add objection #DebateTools) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||||
|
|
20:10 | Are humans omnivores or herbivores? 4 changes history +467 [176.0.152.191 (4×)] | |||
|
|
20:10 (cur | prev) +38 176.0.152.191 discuss (→Humans are herbivores: Add objection #DebateTools) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||||
|
|
20:09 (cur | prev) +107 176.0.152.191 discuss (→Humans are herbivores: Add objection #DebateTools) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||||
|
|
19:55 (cur | prev) +53 176.0.152.191 discuss (→Humans are omnivores: Add objection #DebateTools) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||||
|
|
19:38 (cur | prev) +269 176.0.152.191 discuss (→Humans are omnivores: Add objection #DebateTools) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||||
|
|
16:50 | Is Wikiversity a project worth having? 2 changes history +70 [Dan Polansky (2×)] | |||
|
|
16:50 (cur | prev) +1 Dan Polansky discuss contribs (vision --> mission) | ||||
|
|
14:46 (cur | prev) +69 Dan Polansky discuss contribs (clarify that perhaps the vision is not ''clearly'' defined) | ||||
|
|
N 12:57 | Is homosexuality a disorder? 2 changes history +2,063 [MathXplore; Dan Polansky] | |||
| m |
|
12:57 (cur | prev) +28 MathXplore discuss contribs (added Category:Homosexuality using HotCat) | |||
| N |
|
12:09 (cur | prev) +2,035 Dan Polansky discuss contribs (+) | |||
14 September 2024
|
|
19:32 | Should abortion be legal? 2 changes history +484 [122.161.48.218 (2×)] | |||
|
|
19:32 (cur | prev) +216 122.161.48.218 discuss (→Abortion should be legal in any stage of pregnancy: Add objection #DebateTools) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||||
|
|
19:27 (cur | prev) +268 122.161.48.218 discuss (→Abortion should be legal in any stage of pregnancy: Add objection #DebateTools) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||||
10 September 2024
|
|
08:53 | Are humans omnivores or herbivores? 5 changes history −1 [130.192.68.132 (5×)] | |||
|
|
08:53 (cur | prev) −1 130.192.68.132 discuss Tag: Manual revert | ||||
|
|
08:52 (cur | prev) +1 130.192.68.132 discuss (Undo revision 2651459 by 130.192.68.132 (talk)) Tags: Undo Reverted | ||||
|
|
08:52 (cur | prev) −1 130.192.68.132 discuss (→Humans are omnivores: Edit objection for #DebateTools) Tags: Manual revert Reverted | ||||
|
|
08:50 (cur | prev) +1 130.192.68.132 discuss (Undo revision 2651457 by 130.192.68.132 (talk)) Tags: Undo Reverted | ||||
|
|
08:49 (cur | prev) −1 130.192.68.132 discuss (→Humans are omnivores: Edit objection for #DebateTools) Tag: Reverted | ||||
9 September 2024
|
|
21:56 | Is Wikiversity a project worth having? 2 changes history +6 [Jtneill; Dan Polansky] | |||
|
|
21:56 (cur | prev) +4 Jtneill discuss contribs (→Con: true -> not true) | ||||
|
|
13:45 (cur | prev) +2 Dan Polansky discuss contribs (incorporate the objection about volunteer time into the argument itself) | ||||
|
|
16:27 | Is bitcoin a good investment? 5 changes history +1,740 [Dan Polansky (5×)] | |||
|
|
16:27 (cur | prev) +515 Dan Polansky discuss contribs | ||||
|
|
13:34 (cur | prev) +264 Dan Polansky discuss contribs | ||||
|
|
13:17 (cur | prev) +746 Dan Polansky discuss contribs | ||||
|
|
13:04 (cur | prev) +194 Dan Polansky discuss contribs | ||||
|
|
12:29 (cur | prev) +21 Dan Polansky discuss contribs | ||||
See also
[edit | edit source]- Wikidebate/Guidelines – some wisdom on how to wikidebate
- Wikidebate/Essays – essays about wikidebates
- Template:Form/wikidebate – preload for new wikidebates
- Pageviews – project traffic last month (debates by sorted by views)
- Wikiphilosophers – a similar project aiming to provide an overview of philosophical ideas from new philosophers and thinkers