Literature/1976/Weizenbaum
Appearance
Authors | ||
---|---|---|
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z & |
Wikimedia
[edit | edit source]- ... displays his ambivalence towards computer technology and lays out his case: while artificial intelligence may be possible, we should never allow computers to make important decisions because computers will always lack human qualities such as compassion and wisdom. Weizenbaum makes the crucial distinction between deciding and choosing. Deciding is a computational activity, something that can ultimately be programmed. It is the capacity to choose that ultimately makes us human. Choice, however, is the product of judgment, not calculation. Comprehensive human judgment is able to include non-mathematical factors such as emotions. Judgment can compare apples and oranges, and can do so without quantifying each fruit type and then reductively quantifying each to factors necessary for mathematical comparison.
- ... argued that the misuse of artificial intelligence has the potential to devalue human life.
Wikimedia
[edit | edit source]Chronology
[edit | edit source]- Literature/1986/Dreyfus [^]
- Literature/1983/Dreyfus [^]
- Literature/1980/Searle [^]
- Weizenbaum, Joseph (1976). Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgment To Calculation. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman. [^]
- Literature/1972/Dreyfus [^]
- McCarthy, John; Marvin Minsky; Nathan Rochester & Claude Shannon (1955). A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence. [^]
Reviews
[edit | edit source]Comments
[edit | edit source]