Template:Motivation and emotion/Assessment/Multimedia/Feedback/2023

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Marking and feedback template for the multimedia presentation for Motivation and emotion, 2023.

Designed to be transcluded on a chapter talk page.

Simple example

Usage — Default example[edit source]

{{MEMF/2023
|1=
|2=
|3=
|4=
|5=
|6=
|7=
|8=
}}
~~~~

creates:

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

Overview[edit source]

Content[edit source]

Conclusion[edit source]

Audio[edit source]

Video[edit source]

Meta-data[edit source]

Licensing[edit source]

Detailed example

Detailed example[edit source]

This is the template syntax with some prefilled comments:

{{MEMF/2023
|1=
<!-- Overall comments ... -->
<!-- Overall - Overall -->
# Overall, this is an excellent/very good/reasonably good/basic presentation
# Overall, this is an insufficient presentation mainly because it lacks sufficient synthesis of the best psychological theory and research about this topic
<!-- Overall - Time -->
# The presentation is under the maximum time limit (3 mins), so there was room for further development
# The presentation is over the maximum time limit — content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes
|2=
<!-- Overview comments ... -->
<!-- Overview - Opening -->
# An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed and narrated — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
# An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed. Also narrate the title and sub-title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
# An opening slide with the title is displayed. Also display and narrate the sub-title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
# An opening slide with the sub-title is displayed and narrated. Also display and narrate the title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation and to be consistent with the book chapter.
# The presentation could be improved by displaying and narrating a slide with the same title and sub-title as the book chapter to help the viewer understand the purpose of the presentation
<!-- Overview - Introduction -->
# Very engaging introduction to hook audience interest {{smile}}
# Engaging introduction to hook audience interest
# The presentation has an opening scenario to hook audience interest
# The presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest
# Create an engaging introduction to hook audience interest (e.g., by introducing a case study or scenario)
<!-- Overview - Context -->
# A context for the presentation is clearly established through an example
# A context for the presentation is established
# A basic context for the presentation is established
# Establish a context for the presentation (e.g., by using an example or explaining why it is important), to help the viewer understand
<!-- Overview - Focus -->
# Focus questions and/or an outline of topics are presented
# Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation.
|3=
<!-- Content comments ... -->
# Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
<!-- Content - Addresses topic -->
# The presentation addresses the topic
# The presentation somewhat addresses the topic
# The presentation does not adequately address the topic
<!-- Content - Amount -->
# An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little
# There is too much content, in too much detail, presented within the allocated time frame. Zoom out and provide a higher-level presentation at a slower pace. It is best to cover a small amount of well-targetted content than a large amount of poorly selected content.
# The selection of content is poor because it doesn't adequately use the most relevant psychological theory and/or research to address the topic
<!-- Content - Theory -->
# The presentation makes excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic/little/insufficient/no use of relevant psychological theory
<!-- Content - Research -->
# The presentation makes excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic/little/insufficient/no use of relevant psychological research
# Ideally, make more explicit use of research
<!-- Content - Citations -->
# The presentation makes excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic/insufficient use of citations to support claims
# Use APA style for citations
<!-- Content - Examples -->
# The presentation makes excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice
# The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies
<!-- Content - Easy to understand -->
# The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information
# Provide practical, easy to understand information
|4=
<!-- Conclusion comments ... -->
<!-- Conclusion - Slide -->
# The conclusion provides an excellent summary and take-home message(s)
# The conclusion provides a very good/good/reasonably good/basic summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic
# The conclusion provides very good/good/reasonably good/basic take-home message(s)
# Provide a conclusion slide which summarises the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical, take-home messages in response to each focus question
<!-- Conclusion - Time -->
# The Conclusion only partly fitted within the time limit
# The Conclusion did not fit within the time limit
|5=
<!-- Audio comments ... -->
<!-- Audio - Easy to follow -->
# The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to
# The audio is easy to follow
# The audio is hard to follow because so much content is presented so quickly
<!-- Audio - Narration -->
# The presentation makes effective/very good/good/reasonably good/basic use of narrated audio
<!-- Audio - Pacing -->
# Audio communication is well/reasonably well paced
# Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
# Consider slowing down and leaving longer pauses between sentences. This can help the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
# Slow down and leave longer pauses between sentences. This will help viewers to cognitively digest the spoken information as it is being presented, before moving on to the next point.
<!-- Audio - Voice -->
# Excellent [[w:Intonation (linguistics)|intonation]] enhances listener interest and engagement
# Very good/Good/Reasonably good/Basic [[w:Intonation (linguistics)|intonation]]
# Consider using greater [[w:Intonation (linguistics)|intonation]] to enhance listener interest and engagement
# Use greater [[w:Intonation (linguistics)|intonation]] to enhance listener interest and engagement
# Consider improving [[w:Articulatory phonetics|articulation]] to enhance the clarity of speech
<!-- Audio - Practice -->
# The narration is well/reasonably well practiced and/or performed
# The narration could benefit from further scripting and/or practice
<!-- Audio - Recording quality -->
# Audio recording quality was excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic/poor
# Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality. Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard and/or mouse clicks were audible). Consider using an external microphone.
<!-- Audio - Topic -->
# The narrated [[#Content|content]] is well/reasonably well/poorly matched to the target topic
# The narrated [[#Content|content]] is well/reasonably well to the target topic but lacked synthesis of the best psychological research about this topic
<!-- Audio - Music -->
# Mute the music (or use lower volume) during narration to help the viewer concentrate on the combination of visual information and narrated audio
|6=
<!-- Video comments ... -->
<!-- Video - Overall -->
# Overall, visual display quality is excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic
<!-- Video - Video, Image, Text -->
# The presentation makes creative use of webcam, stock video, and images
# The presentation makes effective/very good/good/reasonably good/basic use of animated slides and/or stock video
# The presentation makes effective/very good/good/reasonably good/basic use of text and image based slides
# The presentation makes basic use of text-based slides
<!-- Video - Font -->
# The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read
# Some of the font size could be larger to make it easier to read
# Consider using a [[w:sans-serif|sans-serif]] typeface to make the text easier to read
# The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time
# The amount of text presented per slide could be reduced to make it easier to read and listen at the same time
# Some slides are a bit too busy/fast
# The presentation could be strengthened by adding some more text (e.g., about take-home messages)
<!-- Video - Images -->
# The visual communication is effectively supplemented by video and/or images
# The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams
# The visual communication is supplemented in a reasonably good/basic way by images and/or diagrams
# Also consider using diagrams
# The visual communication could be improved by including some relevant images and/or diagrams
<!-- Video - Production -->
# The presentation is very well produced
# The presentation is well/reasonably well/basically produced using simple tools
# [https://www.lifewire.com/hide-sound-icon-on-powerpoint-slides-2767122 Hide the audio icon]
# The usability of the presentation could be improved by exporting to a commonly used video hosting platform such as [https://www.youtube.com/ YouTube] or [https://vimeo.com/ Vimeo]
<!-- Video - Topic -->
# The visual [[#Content|content]] is well/reasonably well/poorly matched to the target topic
# The visual [[#Content|content]] is well/reasonably well to the target topic but lacked synthesis of the best psychological research about this topic
|7=
<!-- Meta-data comments ... -->
<!-- Meta-data - Title/sub-title -->
# The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
# The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
# The chapter sub-title but not the chapter title is used in the name of the presentation. The title would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
# The video title does not match the chapter title and sub-title — this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation and be more consistent
<!-- Meta-data - Description -->
# An excellent written description of the presentation is provided
# A very good/good written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
# A brief/very brief written description of the presentation is provided. Expand.
# Provide a written description of the presentation to help potential viewers decide whether or not to watch
# Excellent use of time codes
<!-- Meta-data - Links -->
# Links to and from the book chapter are provided
# An active hyperlink to the book chapter is provided
# An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided because the YouTube user account does not yet have access to [https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9890437 advanced features]
# A link to the book chapter is provided but it goes to a specific section rather than the top of the chapter
# A link to the book chapter is not provided
# A link from the book chapter is provided
# A link from the book chapter was not provided. I've added it.
<!-- Meta-data - Miscellaneous -->
# The presentation is incorrectly categorised as being for kids. This creates limitations, such as being unable to add the presentation to a playlist. [https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9528076 More info].
|8=
<!-- Licensing comments ... -->
<!-- Licensing - Images -->
# Image sources and their copyright status are communicated
# Ideally, provide clickable links to the original image sources (e.g., in the description)
# Image sources are communicated in a general way. Also provide links to each image and the license details (e.g., in the description).
# Image sources and their copyright status are not provided
## The presentation may have/has probably violated the copyrights of image owners as images appear to have been used without permission and/or acknowledgement
## Probably the images are freely available via the editing package but this is not explicitly stated
<!-- Licensing - Presentation -->
# A copyright license for the presentation is provided
# A copyright license for the presentation is provided in the presentation description but not in the [https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/57404 meta-data]
# A copyright license for the presentation is not provided
}}
~~~~

creates:

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent/very good/reasonably good/basic presentation
  2. Overall, this is an insufficient presentation mainly because it lacks sufficient synthesis of the best psychological theory and research about this topic
  3. The presentation is under the maximum time limit (3 mins), so there was room for further development
  4. The presentation is over the maximum time limit — content beyond 3 mins is ignored for marking and feedback purposes

Overview[edit source]

  1. An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed and narrated — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
  2. An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed. Also narrate the title and sub-title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  3. An opening slide with the title is displayed. Also display and narrate the sub-title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  4. An opening slide with the sub-title is displayed and narrated. Also display and narrate the title — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation and to be consistent with the book chapter.
  5. The presentation could be improved by displaying and narrating a slide with the same title and sub-title as the book chapter to help the viewer understand the purpose of the presentation
  6. Very engaging introduction to hook audience interest
  7. Engaging introduction to hook audience interest
  8. The presentation has an opening scenario to hook audience interest
  9. The presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest
  10. Create an engaging introduction to hook audience interest (e.g., by introducing a case study or scenario)
  11. A context for the presentation is clearly established through an example
  12. A context for the presentation is established
  13. A basic context for the presentation is established
  14. Establish a context for the presentation (e.g., by using an example or explaining why it is important), to help the viewer understand
  15. Focus questions and/or an outline of topics are presented
  16. Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation.

Content[edit source]

  1. Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section
  2. The presentation addresses the topic
  3. The presentation somewhat addresses the topic
  4. The presentation does not adequately address the topic
  5. An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little
  6. There is too much content, in too much detail, presented within the allocated time frame. Zoom out and provide a higher-level presentation at a slower pace. It is best to cover a small amount of well-targetted content than a large amount of poorly selected content.
  7. The selection of content is poor because it doesn't adequately use the most relevant psychological theory and/or research to address the topic
  8. The presentation makes excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic/little/insufficient/no use of relevant psychological theory
  9. The presentation makes excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic/little/insufficient/no use of relevant psychological research
  10. Ideally, make more explicit use of research
  11. The presentation makes excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic/insufficient use of citations to support claims
  12. Use APA style for citations
  13. The presentation makes excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice
  14. The presentation could be improved by making more use of examples or case studies
  15. The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information
  16. Provide practical, easy to understand information

Conclusion[edit source]

  1. The conclusion provides an excellent summary and take-home message(s)
  2. The conclusion provides a very good/good/reasonably good/basic summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic
  3. The conclusion provides very good/good/reasonably good/basic take-home message(s)
  4. Provide a conclusion slide which summarises the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical, take-home messages in response to each focus question
  5. The Conclusion only partly fitted within the time limit
  6. The Conclusion did not fit within the time limit

Audio[edit source]

  1. The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to
  2. The audio is easy to follow
  3. The audio is hard to follow because so much content is presented so quickly
  4. The presentation makes effective/very good/good/reasonably good/basic use of narrated audio
  5. Audio communication is well/reasonably well paced
  6. Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
  7. Consider slowing down and leaving longer pauses between sentences. This can help the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point.
  8. Slow down and leave longer pauses between sentences. This will help viewers to cognitively digest the spoken information as it is being presented, before moving on to the next point.
  9. Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement
  10. Very good/Good/Reasonably good/Basic intonation
  11. Consider using greater intonation to enhance listener interest and engagement
  12. Use greater intonation to enhance listener interest and engagement
  13. Consider improving articulation to enhance the clarity of speech
  14. The narration is well/reasonably well practiced and/or performed
  15. The narration could benefit from further scripting/practice
  16. Audio recording quality was excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic/poor
  17. Review microphone set-up to achieve higher recording quality. Probably an on-board microphone was used (e.g., keyboard and/or mouse clicks were audible). Consider using an external microphone.
  18. The narrated content is well/reasonably well/somewhat/poorly matched to the target topic
  19. The narrated content is well/reasonably well to the target topic but lacked synthesis of the best psychological research about this topic
  20. Mute the music (or use lower volume) during narration to help the viewer concentrate on the combination of visual information and narrated audio

Video[edit source]

  1. Overall, visual display quality is excellent/very good/good/reasonably good/basic
  2. The presentation makes creative use of webcam, stock video, and images
  3. The presentation makes effective/very good/good/reasonably good/basic use of animated slides and/or stock video
  4. The presentation makes effective/very good/good/reasonably good/basic use of text and image based slides
  5. The presentation makes basic use of text-based slides
  6. The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read
  7. Some of the font size could be larger to make it easier to read
  8. Consider using a sans-serif typeface to make the text easier to read
  9. The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time
  10. The amount of text presented per slide could be reduced to make it easier to read and listen at the same time
  11. Some slides are a bit too busy/fast
  12. The presentation could be strengthened by adding some more text (e.g., about take-home messages)
  13. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by video and/or images
  14. The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams
  15. The visual communication is supplemented in a reasonably good/basic way by images and/or diagrams
  16. Also consider using diagrams
  17. The visual communication could be improved by including some relevant images and/or diagrams
  18. The presentation is very well produced
  19. The presentation is well/reasonably well/basically produced using simple tools
  20. Hide the audio icon
  21. The usability of the presentation could be improved by exporting to a commonly used video hosting platform such as YouTube or Vimeo
  22. The visual content is well/reasonably well/somewhat/poorly matched to the target topic
  23. The visual content is well/reasonably well to the target topic but lacked synthesis of the best psychological research about this topic

Meta-data[edit source]

  1. The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation
  2. The chapter title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. The sub-title (or an abbreviation of the sub-title that fits within the 100 character limit) would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  3. The chapter sub-title but not the chapter title is used in the name of the presentation. The title would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation.
  4. The video title does not match the chapter title and sub-title — this would help to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation and be more consistent
  5. An excellent written description of the presentation is provided
  6. A very good/good written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding.
  7. A brief/very brief written description of the presentation is provided. Expand.
  8. Provide a written description of the presentation to help potential viewers decide whether or not to watch
  9. Excellent use of time codes
  10. Links to and from the book chapter are provided
  11. An active hyperlink to the book chapter is provided
  12. An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided because the YouTube user account does not yet have access to advanced features
  13. A link to the book chapter is provided but it goes to a specific section rather than the top of the chapter
  14. A link to the book chapter is not provided
  15. A link from the book chapter is provided
  16. A link from the book chapter was not provided. I've added it.
  17. The presentation is incorrectly categorised as being for kids. This creates limitations, such as being unable to add the presentation to a playlist. More info.

Licensing[edit source]

  1. Image sources and their copyright status are communicated
  2. Ideally, provide clickable links to the original image sources (e.g., in the description)
  3. Image sources are communicated in a general way. Also provide links to each image and the license details (e.g., in the description).
  4. Image sources and their copyright status are not provided
    1. The presentation may have/has probably violated the copyrights of image owners as images appear to have been used without permission and/or acknowledgement
    2. Probably the images are freely available via the editing package but this is not explicitly stated
  5. A copyright license for the presentation is provided
  6. A copyright license for the presentation is provided in the presentation description but not in the meta-data
  7. A copyright license for the presentation is not provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:39, 6 November 2023 (UTC) -- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:06, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

See also[edit source]