Talk:WikiJournal Preprints/Digital media use and mental health
Add topic
This article is an unpublished pre-print undergoing public peer review organised by the WikiJournal of Medicine.
It is adapted from the Wikipedia page Digital media use and mental health. It contains some or all of that page's content licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike License and will also be used to update that article after peer review.You can follow its progress through the peer review process at this tracking page.First submitted:
Article text
QID: Q99557809
Suggested (provisional) preprint citation format:
Digital media use and mental health, Wikidata Q99557809
License: 
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original author and source are credited.
Jackie Koerner contact
João Peschanski 
contact
Rachel Wexelbaum contact
Article information
This is the pre-publication public peer review for the article Digital media use and mental health
Plagiarism check
[edit source]
Pass. - Report from WMF copyvios tool found trivial duplications of common phrases such as "he 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11)", not regarded as plagiarism. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 10:46, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia FA review
[edit source]I have had significant review in Wikipedia for the article, with support from Wikipedia so far from a Psychiatric expert for FA nomination. For this reason I have requested the change of the article to being considered initially by WikiJournal of Medicine, but I am happy for any editorial decision as to which journal it would be most appropriate in. With many kind thanks. --E.3 (discuss • contribs) 14:34, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- For reference, FA nomination comments are at this link. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 10:46, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikipedia FA review complete
[edit source]The enwiki FA review was completed and promoted today. @Evolution and evolvability:, can you kindly please help me by reimporting that reviewed version to here, for external peer review/ editorial decision? Thanks --E.3 (discuss • contribs) 14:58, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
- Import of updated version from Wikipedia since FA promotion complete. Any peer reviewer currently reviewing article will be notified of the updated version. T.Shafee(Evo﹠Evo)talk 09:22, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Delisted - No longer a Featured Article
[edit source]The Wikipedia article was delisted, i.e., it is not longer a Featured Article as of 30 Dec 2023. In addition, two tags were added to the article: More medical citations needed (Dec 2023) and Cleanup reorganize (April 2024). Some very experienced editors have had some preliminary discussions about improving the article - see the article's talk page. - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) 15:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Recommendation: Revise and resubmit for peer review
[edit source]I am not one of the editors listed for this article, but if the authors are still interested, my personal suggestion is to revise the article and resubmit for peer review. Why? It has been five years since the article was submitted and there has been a lot of new research since that time, i.e., the currently submitted article is out of date. The authors might want to consider working with other Wikipedians on restoring the Wikipedia article to Good or FA status and using that as a springboard for a revised submission. There are some experienced medical editors who might work with you (see Talk:Digital media use and mental health/FAR notice and subsequent topics). Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) [he/him] 23:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Courtesy ping to @Almaty: in case they missed this suggested recommendation. OhanaUnitedTalk page 21:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC)