Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Transcendental future time perspective, motivation, and emotion

Heading casing

Hi StutiDoshi1. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:22, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and/or sub-title were not correctly worded and/or formatted (fixed) 2. Headings See earlier comment about Heading casing Basic, mostly 1-level heading structure – could benefit from further development, perhaps using a 2-level structure Adopt closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings Aim for 3 to 6 top-level headings between the Overview and Conclusion, with up to a similar number of sub-headings for large sections Avoid having sections with only 1 sub-heading – use 0 or 2+ sub-headings 3. Overview Excellent - Scenario, image, evocative description of the problem/topic, relevant psychological theory/research, and focus questions A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box with an image at the start of this section Consider adapting the scenario to refer to future transcendental time perspective; or at least tailor towards how this perspective may affect the person's present emotion and motivation Simplify/abbreviate the description of the problem/question i.e., make this section more user-friendly and move detail into subsequent sections. Focus questions are basic. They are quite general. As a better understanding of the topic develops, make these more specific. Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended 4. Key points Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations Avoid providing too much background information (e.g., about time perspective). Aim to briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title (i.e., focus on transcendental time perspective. It may be necessary to search beyond just "transcendental" to include synonymous terms Promising balance of theory and research. Ideally, also include more examples. Conclusion (the most important section): Well developed What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?) 5. Figure A relevant figure is presented and captioned Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) Promising use of quiz question(s) Focus the quiz question(s) on the take-home messages for each focus question Promising use of table(s) Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 6. Learning feature No comment 7. References Very good Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? Check and correct APA referencing style: capitalisation italicisation 8. Resources See also OK Also link to relevant Wikipedia pages External links OK Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see Tutorial 02) 9. User page Very good Good Created – minimal, but sufficient Not created – see Tutorial 02 Description about self provided Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Add link to book chapter 10. Social contribution Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence If adding the second or subsequent link to a page (or a talk/discussion page), create a direct link like / Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:16, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

social contribution

hey, I really love this topic you have gone in depth on the psychological theories which integrates motivation and emotion effectively. it would be great to see tips on how we could integrate transcendental future time perspective into daily life in terms of long-term motivation such as visualising distant future outcomes or aligning daily tasks with long-term aspirations. Great work so far :) U3236683 (discuss • contribs) 20:25, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a reasonably good chapter. It makes promising use of psychological theory and some use of research to address a real-world phenomenon or problem. The main areas for potential improvement are to remain focused on psychological (rather than philosophical/religious etc.) perspectives and to use better quality written expression for science-based communication Reasonably good use of academic, peer-reviewed citations to support claims In some places, better use could be made of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Move embedded external links to non-peer-reviewed sources into the External links section For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Solid Engages reader via a reasonably relevant case study or scenario in a feature box with a relevant image Explains the psychological problem or phenomenon reasonably well Too long. Move detail into subsequent sections. Overly historical, religious, philosophical and insufficiently psychologically focused The focus questions are reasonably clear Theory A very good range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained Builds effectively on other chapters and/or Wikipedia articles Very good depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) Some use of tables, figures, and/or lists to help convey key theoretical information In some places, there is insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Reasonably good use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Reasonably good review of relevant research More detail about key studies would be ideal Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? In some places, there is insufficient use of academic, peer-reviewed citations (e.g., see the tags) Insufficient critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Some claims lack sufficient citation (e.g., see the tags) Integration Reasonably good integration between theory and research The chapter places more emphasis on theory than on research; strive for an integrated balance Conclusion Basic summary and conclusion Abbreviate to focus on a cohesive summary of the best available psychological theory and research about the topic Avoid drifting outside of psychology and evidence Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is OK but there are several aspects which are below professional standard Some sentences are overly long. Strive for the simplest expression. Consider splitting longer sentences into two shorter sentences. Shorter words and sentences are more readable. Try conducting a readability analysis such as via https://www.webfx.com/tools/read-able/. This chapter gets a score of . Aim for 50+. Avoid one sentence paragraphs. Communicate one idea per paragraph using three to five sentences. Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes Grammar The grammar for some/many sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags) Consider using a grammar checking tool Another option is to use a services provided by UC, such as Studiosity Proofreading Remove unnecessary capitalisation – more info APA style Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Express numbers < 10 using words (e.g., two) and >= 10 and over using numerals (e.g., 99) Figures Reasonably well captioned Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text. Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., "(see Figure 1)"; do not use bold, italics, check and correct capitalisation). Citations use very good APA style (7th ed.). To improve: If there are three or more authors, cite the first author followed by et al., then year. For example, either: in-text, Smith et al. (2020), or in parentheses (Smith et al., 2020) References use reasonably good APA style: Check and correct use of capitalisation[2] Check and correct use of italicisation Learning features Very good use of learning features Very good use of embedded in-text interwiki links to Wikipedia articles. Adding more interwiki links for the first mention of key words and technical concepts would make the text even more interactive. See example. One use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Reasonably good use of figure(s) Basic use of table(s) – Needs APA style caption and to be referred to using APA style ast least once in the main text Basic use of feature box(es) Basic use of scenarios, case studies, or examples Excellent use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Very good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Very good use of external links in the "External links" section Social contribution ~6 logged, useful, mostly moderate to major contributions with direct links to evidence An image was also uploaded

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:22, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic presentation Overview The opening conveys the purpose of the presentation in a basic way The presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest A basic context for the presentation is established Consider asking focus questions to help focus and discipline the presentation Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation somewhat addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes basic use of citations to support claims The presentation makes basic use of one or more examples The presentation provides basic practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion The conclusion provides a reasonably good summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic The conclusion provides reasonably good take-home message(s) Include a slide summarising these points Avoid advancing viewpoints that are beyond scientific evidence Audio The presentation makes reasonably good use of narrated audio Audio communication is reasonably well-paced Reasonably good intonation The narration is well/reasonably well practiced and/or performed The narration could benefit from further scripting and/or practice Audio recording quality was very good Mute the music during narration to help the viewer concentrate on the combination of visual information and narrated audio The narrated content is reasonably well matched to the target topic Video Overall, visual display quality is reasonably good The presentation makes reasonably good use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The amount of text presented per slide could be reduced to make it easier to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in an good way by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools The visual content is reasonably well matched to the target topic Meta-data The correct title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. This would help to convey the purpose of the presentation and be consistent. A very good written description of the presentation is provided. Consider expanding. An inactive hyperlink to the book chapter is provided (maybe because the YouTube user account doesn't have advanced features) A link from the book chapter is provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is in the description but not in the license field

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)