Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Body neutrality and emotional well-being

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Interesting Research Paper

[edit source]

Hi Lucy,

I noticed you started looking at different strategies to achieve body neutrality and thought this paper would assist in your research as I think it does a great job outlining some initial strategies, it is titled 'Developing a definition of body neutrality and strategies for an intervention' and is hyperlinked here - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1740144523001031.

Kind regards,

Charlotte CharlotteLane55 (discusscontribs) 04:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Heading casing

Hi Lucywilson 546. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

~~~~


Topic development feedback

[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

  1. The title and/or sub-title were not correctly worded and/or formatted (fixed)
  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development
  3. Good alignment between focus questions and heading structure
  4. Some of the headings are very long – consider abbreviations
  5. The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings
  6. Remove trailing colons from headings
  7. Check grammar (e.g., missing question mark)
  1. The Overview is too long – move detail into subsequent sections
  2. A scenario or case study is presented in a feature box at the start of this section. Add an image to the scenario to help attract reader interest.
  3. Simplify/abbreviate the description of the problem/topic to make it more user-friendly. Move detail into subsequent sections.
  4. Focus questions are aligned with sub-title and top-level headings
  5. Question 1 is not about body neutrality
  6. Remove italics
  7. Present focus questions in a feature box
  1. Key points are well developed for each section, with some relevant citations
  2. Many of the key points lack citations
  3. Strive for an integrated balance of the best psychological theory and research about this topic, with practical examples
  4. It is unclear whether the best available research has been consulted in the preparation of this plan
  5. Use APA style 7th edition or wiki style for citations, but not both
  6. Use Australian spelling (e.g., analyze -> analyse; behavior -> behaviour)
  7. Move references into the References section. Keep citations in the main body.
  8. Move external links into the external links section
  9. Is some of this genAI content? If so, it needs to be acknowledged as such in the edit summaries, otherwise it violates academic integrity.
  10. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Underway
    2. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)
  1. Excellent - One or more relevant figure(s) is/are presented, captioned, and cited
  2. The figure caption(s) provide(s) a clear, appropriately detailed description that is meaningfully connected with the main text
  3. Cite each figure at least once in the main text using APA style
  1. Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies
  3. Excellent use of quiz question(s)
  4. Promising use of one or more table(s)
  5. Add caption to table and cite table at least once in the main text
  1. Good
  2. Well done on identifying relevant systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses
  3. Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links
  4. Remember that the goal is to identify and use the best academic theory and research about this topic
  1. See also
    1. Not developed
  2. External links
    1. Very good
    2. Use sentence casing
    3. Use alphabetical order
  1. Good
  2. Description about self provided
  3. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  4. A link to the book chapter is provided
  1. None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 03). Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 10:15, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply