Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2023/Equine therapy and emotion

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Initial suggestions[edit source]

@SoSilverLibby: Thanks for tackling this topic.

Some initial suggestions:

  • Consider situating "equine therapy" in the broader context of adventure/wilderness/nature therapy and also animal therapy
  • Also check out other psychotherapy chapters and see how you can build on, link to, and integrate with that work
  • What psychological theories can help to understand? What is the main research in this area?

Let me know if I can do anything else as you go along.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 06:31, 6 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, James. This is very helpful. SoSilverLibby (discusscontribs) 21:19, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Heading casing[edit source]

FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example:

Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory

Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)Reply


Topic development feedback[edit source]

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.

Title[edit source]

  1. The wording and/or capitalisation of the title is incorrect. Be consistent with the book table of contents.
  2. The wording and/or capitalisation of the sub-title is incorrect. Be consistent with the book table of contents.

Headings[edit source]

  1. See earlier comment about Heading casing
  2. Promising, but overly complicated 2-level heading structure – consider simplifying
  3. Don't try to do too much - cut to the chase; zero on the sub-title question
  4. Adopt closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings
  5. Remove author names from headings
  6. Be very selective about the theories - only choose the best/most relevant theories

Overview[edit source]

  1. Add a scenario or case study into a feature box (with an image) at the start of this section to help catch reader interest
  2. A brief, evocative description of the problem/topic is provided
  3. Promising focus questions
  4. Closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended

Key points[edit source]

  1. Partial development of key points for some sections, with some relevant citations
  2. For sections which include sub-sections include key points for an overview paragraph prior to branching into the sub-headings
  3. Avoid providing too much background information. Briefly summarise general concepts and provide internal wiki links to relevant book chapters and/or Wikipedia pages for further information. Then focus most of the content of this on directly answering the core question(s) posed by the chapter sub-title.
  4. Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research, with practical examples
  5. Suggest turning an interview or two into case studies in feature boxes that illustrate key points from the psychological theory and research and include link to interview
  6. Conclusion (the most important section):
    1. Hasn't been developed
    2. What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?)

Figure[edit source]

  1. A relevant figure is presented and captioned
  2. Cite each figure at least once in the main text
  3. Consider increasing image size from to make it easier to view

Learning feature[edit source]

  1. Include in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters
  2. Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) - but only what is on the wiki page will count for marking purposes, not external content
  3. Consider including more quiz question(s), table(s) etc.

References[edit source]

  1. OK
  2. Are there any systematic reviews about this topic?
  3. For APA referencing style, check and correct:
    1. capitalisation
    2. italicisation
    3. doi formatting
    4. make doi hyperlinks active (i.e., clickable)
    5. page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-)
    6. Full journal names are needed

Resources[edit source]

  1. See also
    1. Excellent
    2. Very good
    3. OK
    4. One of out of two links provided
    5. Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02)
    6. Use sentence casing
    7. Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see Tutorial 02)
    8. Include source in brackets after link
    9. Include "(Book chapter, year)" after links to other motivation and emotion book chapters on Wikiversity
    10. Also link to related book chapters
    11. Also link to relevant Wikipedia pages
    12. Not developed
  2. External links
    1. Excellent
    2. Very good
    3. OK
    4. Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02)
    5. Use sentence casing
    6. Rename links so that they are more user friendly (see Tutorial 02)
    7. Include source in brackets after link
    8. Only include links directly related to the sub-title
    9. Target an international audience; Australians only represent 0.33% of the world population
    10. Not developed
  3. Good choice of links, but poorly formatted (see Tutorial 02)

User page[edit source]

  1. Description about self provided
  2. Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks.
  3. Add link to book chapter

Social contribution[edit source]

  1. Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence
  2. At least one contribution has been made and summarised with indirect link(s) to evidence
  3. If adding the second or subsequent link to a page (or a talk/discussion page), create a direct link like / Add direct links to evidence. To do this: View the page history, select the version of the page before and after your contributions, click "compare selected revisions", and then use this website address as a direct link to evidence for listing on your user page. For more info, see Making and summarising social contributions.
  4. Great to see you on X (formally known as Twitter)!
  5. Use a numbered list (see Tutorial 02)
  6. Add a brief summary of each contribution
  7. None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence – this was covered in Tutorial 03. Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see how to earn marks for social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 11:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)Reply