Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2016/Tickling and emotion

Comments

Hi, I have found a great article titled: "Facial expressions, smile types, and self-report during humour, tickle and pain. The introduction of the article will be very helpful for your overview section of your chapter. It discusses the fact that a tickle has been poorly understood and you could begin your chapter by stating this. You could also mention Darwin's views on tickling which are stated in the introduction of the article and throughout and state how his views have withheld throughout the years in tickle research. The current study explored participants reactions to tickling and compared these with reactions to pain and humour. You could format some of your chapter in this way (breaking your headings up into pleasant and unpleasant reactions of tickling). it would be interesting from a readers perspective to explore these two opposing views and would make for an excellent discussion point in your conclusion. All the best I have included the link to the article here which can be accessed through the university library website (EBSCOhost). http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/ehost/detail/detail?vid=58&sid=889252a6-f974-4d48-9291-aad9a8a0aefa%40sessionmgr101&hid=124&bdata=#AN=17835460&db=bth I hope this is helpful for you ! --LeoDean1993 (discuss • contribs) 07:25, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

I have found some interesting articles that you may like to explore --U3166203 (discuss • contribs) 22:33, 23 October 2016 (UTC) http://zh9bf5sp6t.scholar.serialssolutions.com/?sid=google&auinit=T&aulast=Yamamuro&atitle=Neurogenesis+in+the+dentate+gyrus+of+the+rat+hippocampus+enhanced+by+tickling+stimulation+with+positive+emotion&id=doi:10.1016/j.neures.2010.09.001&title=Neuroscience+research&volume=68&issue=4&date=2010&spage=285&issn=0168-0102 http://zh9bf5sp6t.scholar.serialssolutions.com/?sid=google&auinit=DP&aulast=Szameitat&atitle=It+is+not+always+tickling:+distinct+cerebral+responses+during+perception+of+different+laughter+types&id=doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.028&title=NeuroImage+(Orlando,+Fla.)&volume=53&issue=4&date=2010&spage=1264&issn=1053-8119 http://zh9bf5sp6t.scholar.serialssolutions.com/?sid=google&auinit=K&aulast=Sander&atitle=Auditory+perception+of+laughing+and+crying+activates+human+amygdala+regardless+of+attentional+state&id=doi:10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00045-3&title=Brain+research.+Cognitive+brain+research&volume=12&issue=2&date=2001&spage=181&issn=0926-6410 -> this one may be interesting

- also you could look at laughing and when things go wrong e.g. in some cases of brain injury people are unable to distinguish between laughing and crying and this may be due to the same areas of brain activation. --U3166203 (discuss • contribs) 22:33, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

http://zh9bf5sp6t.scholar.serialssolutions.com/?sid=google&auinit=K&aulast=Sander&atitle=Audition+of+laughing+and+crying+leads+to+right+amygdala+activation+in+a+low-noise+fMRI+setting&id=doi:10.1016/S1385-299X(03)00018-7&title=Brain+research.+Brain+research+protocols&volume=11&issue=2&date=2003&spage=81&issn=1385-299X --U3166203 (discuss • contribs) 22:33, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

http://zh9bf5sp6t.scholar.serialssolutions.com/?sid=google&auinit=S&aulast=Sakuragi&atitle=Effects+of+laughing+and+weeping+on+mood+and+heart+rate+variability.&id=doi:10.2114/jpa.21.159&title=Journal+of+physiological+anthropology&volume=21&issue=3&date=2002&spage=159&issn=1345-3475--U3166203 (discuss • contribs) 22:33, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Heading casing

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings. For example, use: ==Cats and dogs== rather than ==Cats and Dogs== -- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:18, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a fantastic chapter which makes effective use of the wiki environment and provides an integrated, indepth, but very readable synthesis of psychological theory and research on the topic. For more feedback see these copyedits and the comments below. Feel free to make ongoing changes to the chapter if you wish to address any of these comments or make other improvements. Theory Overview Clear and well-written. Body Well-selected, critical focus on a range of relevant theories. Well integrated with discussion of research. Conclusion Offers a succint, clear, well-written summary. Research Several very useful/relevant research studies are described and cited. When discussing important research findings, indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship. Written expression Written expression Excellent; some minor errors - see my copyedits. The chapter successfully addresses the topic and book theme. Structure and headings The chapter is well-structured. See earlier comments about heading casing Each section should start with at least one introductory paragraph before branching into sub-sections. Layout Tables and/or Figures are used effectively. Integration with other chapters Limited integration with other chapters is evident. Learning features Excellent use of interwiki links to relevant Wikipedia articles. Quiz questions are used effectively to encourage reader engagement. Spelling, grammar, and proofreading are excellent. APA style The reference list is not in full APA style. subjects -> participants (If animals were used, use the term subjects. If humans were used, use the term participants.)

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:27, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic, but sufficient presentation. Structure and content Overview OK Selection and organisation Too much content is presented - be more selective - e.g., work backwards from 3 take-home messages to work out what content needs to be presented - and then focus on only that which is essential to conveying these messages. Theory rich; research poor. Consider using more illustrative examples. Doesn't clearly address a self-help theme. Citations and references are included. Conclusion None provided. A Conclusion slide summarising the take-home messages / key points could be helpful. Communication Audio Audio is clear and well-paced. Visuals Basic - approximately half a dozen text-based slides with some images. Consider including images, figures, and/or tables. Production quality Overall, basic production. Meta-data Well titled. Link to and from the book chapter provided. Expand the Description field (e.g., provide a brief description of the presentation). Audio recording quality Audio has some white noise and is a bit echoey - review microphone set-up. Image/video recording quality Effective use of simple tools. Licensing A copyright license for the presentation is not indicated (i.e., in the meta-data or the visual presentation).

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:39, 29 November 2016 (UTC)