Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2016/Sexual offender risk assessment

Comments

Hey I found a potentially useful article for you to use. Heres the link http://eprints.qut.edu.au/1070/1/dwyer1.pdf but just in case it doesn't work the article is called Sex Crime Recidivism: Evaluation of a Sexual Offender Treatment Program by Robert Schweitzer and Jonathan Dwyer (2003). If you chose to use this article it can be referenced as Hartig, T., Mang, M., & Evans, G. (1991). Restorative Effects of Natural Environment Experiences. Environment And Behavior, 23(1), 3-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916591231001 and in-text citation is (Hartig, Mang, & Evans, 1991) cheers U3141229 (discuss • contribs) 12:29, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Douglas P Boer

Check out the work in this area by Douglas P Boer e.g.,

Boer, D.P. (2006). Sexual offender risk assessment strategies: is there a convergence of opinion yet? Sex Offender Treatment, 1(1).

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 21:11, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Heading casing

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings. For example, use: ==Cats and dogs== rather than ==Cats and Dogs== -- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:56, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a very solid, well-written and well-explained chapter which makes excellent use of theory and research to address the question. For more feedback see these copyedits and the comments below. Theory Theory is well explained and well covered. Research Research is well explained. Of note was the emphasis on use of meta-analyses and other top studies. Appropriate evidence of critical thinking about research limitations evident. Excellent use of effect sizes and recidivism rates. A couple of statements were unreferenced (e.g., see the tags) Written expression Written expression is excellent. Some clarification templates have been added to the page. The Overview and Conclusion are clear and well-written. Layout See earlier comments about heading casing Avoid sections with only one sub-section. A section should have no sub-sections or at least two sub-sections. The chapter is well-structured. Limited use of Tables and/or Figures. Learning features The chapter makes excellent use of interwiki links to other book chapters and to relevant Wikipedia articles. Spelling, grammar, and proofreading are generally excellent. APA style The APA style for the reference list is very good; remove issue numbers for paginated journals.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:56, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic, but sufficient presentation. Overall, this is a solid presentation. Overall, this is a well prepared and executed presentation. Overall, this is a very well prepared and executed presentation. Overall, this is an excellent all-round presentation. Structure and content Overview Brief Use the Overview to set up the problem to be solved (the question i.e., the subtitle for the book chapter). Tell the listener what they will find out about if they watch this presentation. Selection and organisation Well selected content - not too much or too little. Well structured. Theory was well covered. Research was well covered. Perhaps consider using more illustrative examples. Citations and references are included. Conclusion None provided. Communication Audio Well narrated. Consider using greater intonation to enhance engagement.[1] Audio is clear and well-paced. Visuals Basic - text on half a dozen slides with some images. Consider including more images, figures, and/or tables. Production quality Overall, basic production. Meta-data Rename the title so that it includes the subtitle (and matches the book chapter). Add a link to the book chapter. Fill out the description field (e.g., brief description of presentation, link back to the book chapter, license details, and possibly include references, image attributions, and/or transcript). Audio recording quality Good Image/video recording quality Good Hide record bar from bottom of screen Licensing A copyright license for the presentation is correctly shown in at least one location. Standard YouTube License.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:47, 22 November 2016 (UTC)