Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2016/Sex and happiness

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comments[edit source]

Hi there :) Looks like you have a great foundation for your chapter! I have found some articles that might be of use http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/science/article/pii/S0167268115000050 http://muse.jhu.edu.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/article/517484 http://link.springer.com.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/article/10.1007%2Fs10902-011-9301-7 http://ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rlh&AN=9603196282

  • For your sub headings on Traditional relationships and Open relationships; it might be interesting for you to source some known examples of how these relationships work or don't work? Like celebrity couples for instance that are in traditional/open relationships
  • You could also research how couples who engage in more foreplay before sex may be more happier than those who go straight into sex with no foreplay?

Goodluck with your chapter :)--U3100166 (discusscontribs) 06:20, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!! Your topic sounds so interesting and I can't wait to see it once it has been completed :) here is an interesting article that I found on happiness and sex, hopefully it can help in your book chapter. http://business.monash.edu/economics/research/publications/2014/3914sexchengsmyth.pdf--Lizzy94 (discusscontribs) 04:55, 22 October 2016 (UTC)U3083568 (discusscontribs) 15:55, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Heading casing[edit source]

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings. For example, use:

==Cats and dogs==

rather than

==Cats and Dogs==

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:16, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Multimedia[edit source]

look at some of these interactive quizzes that you could use to liven up the page http://www.drphil.com/pages/rhpt/ http://www.youbeauty.com/quizzes/sexual-satisfaction/ http://thestir.cafemom.com/love_sex/196148/quiz_how_much_does_your--U3166203 (discusscontribs) 22:15, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Topics[edit source]

some interesting topic to explore include; - self-confidence in improving your sex life - http://zh9bf5sp6t.scholar.serialssolutions.com/?sid=google&auinit=EJ&aulast=Lee&atitle=Effects+of+the+influence+agent%E2%80%99s+sex+and+self-confidence+on+informational+social+influence+in+computer-mediated+communication:+Quantitative+versus+verbal+presentation&id=doi:10.1177/0093650204271398&title=Communication+research&volume=32&issue=1&date=2005&spage=29&issn=0093-6502 - quality of the relationship - http://zh9bf5sp6t.scholar.serialssolutions.com/?sid=google&auinit=H&aulast=Cheng&atitle=Personality,+peer+relations,+and+self-confidence+as+predictors+of+happiness+and+loneliness&id=doi:10.1006/jado.2002.0475&title=Journal+of+adolescence+(London,+England.)&volume=25&issue=3&date=2002&spage=327&issn=0140-1971 --U3166203 (discusscontribs) 22:15, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a solid chapter.
  2. For more feedback see these copyedits and the comments below.
  3. Feel free to make ongoing changes to the chapter if you wish to address any of these comments or make other improvements.

Theory[edit source]

  1. Overview
    1. Clear and well-written, includes example and focus questions.
  2. Body
    1. Well-selected, critical focus on a range of relevant theories.
    2. Well integrated with discussion of research.
  3. Conclusion
    1. Offers a succint summary and emphasises solutions.

Research[edit source]

  1. A good range of useful/relevant research studies are described.
  2. Some statements are unreferenced (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)
  3. Isn't there some more concrete research about the happiness couples have sex X times per week? (Or the least happiness couples are those who ...)
  4. When discussing important research findings, indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.

Written expression[edit source]

  1. Written expression
    1. For academic writing in psychology, such as this book chapter, write in third person rather than first (e.g., avoid "I', "we", "our") or second (e.g., "you", "your" etc.) person perspective.
    2. Use an active rather than a passive voice.
    3. The chapter successfully addresses the topic and book theme.
  2. Structure and headings
    1. The chapter is well-structured.
  3. Layout
    1. Add bullet-points for See also and External links.
    2. Tables and/or Figures are used reasonably effectively.
  4. Integration with other chapters
    1. Limited integration with other chapters is evident - for more, see Category:Motivation and emotion/Book/Sexual motivation.
  5. Learning features
    1. Limited use of interwiki links to relevant Wikipedia articles - more could be added.
    2. Quiz questions are used effectively to encourage reader engagement.
  6. Spelling, grammar, and proofreading are excellent.
  7. APA style
    1. Check and correct the APA style for how to report numbers (Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numbers (e.g., 10)).
    2. Check and correct use of single versus double quotation marks
    3. Check and correct the APA style for citations when there are six or more authors.
    4. The APA style for the reference list is very good; remove issue numbers for paginated journals.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is an excellent all-round presentation.

Structure and content[edit source]

  1. Overview
    1. Great - establishes the problem and its importance in a clear and understandable way.
  2. Selection and organisation
    1. Very well selected content - not too much or too little.
    2. Theory was well covered.
    3. Research was well covered.
    4. Addresses a self-help theme.
    5. Uses meaningful examples.
    6. Citations and references are included.
  3. Conclusion
    1. Take-home messages / key points are well summarised.

Communication[edit source]

  1. Audio
    1. Beautifully narrated.
    2. Audio is clear and well-paced.
    3. Varied intonation added interest and engagement.
  2. Visuals
    1. Clear and easy to read.
    2. The combination of images and text is effective.

Production quality[edit source]

  1. Overall, very well produced.
  2. Meta-data
    1. Well titled.
    2. Link to and from the book chapter provided.
    3. Excellent use of the Description field to provide relevant information.
  3. Audio recording quality
    1. Excellent
  4. Image/video recording quality
    1. Effective use of simple tools.
  5. Licensing
    1. The stated license in the description doesn't match the selected youtube license.
    2. Partial information about the copyright licenses and sources of the images used is provided - provide more detail e.g., the direct links to the sources.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:56, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]