Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2016/Prejudice and emotion

Heading casing

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings. For example, use: ==Cats and dogs== rather than ==Cats and Dogs== -- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:08, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

HI!

Just thought I'd suggest looking into the differences between implicit attitudes towards prejudice and explicit behaviours. It looked like you are saying that emotion predict prejudice more than an imlicit attitude. I remember reading that implicit attitudes predict prejudice more than explicit behaviours. Perhaps you can use that as a further comparison. I believe it was in the social Psych text book. Bee Taylor (discuss • contribs) 00:56, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Hi again,

Just alphabetized and formatted you reference list for you. However, there are a couple references I am not sure if are correct.

I am not sure where you got this reference from. Is it a book or journal? Dovidio, J. F., Hewstone, M., Glick, P., & Esses, V. M. (2010). Prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination: theoretical and empirical overview. The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination, 3-29

again where is this one from? Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (2002). Intergroup emotions and the social self: Prejudice reconceptualized as differentiated reactions to outgroups. The social self: Cognitive, interpersonal, and intergroup perspectives, 309-326.

and finally this one as well Roseman, I. J., & Smith, C. A. (2001). Appraisal theory: Overview, assumptions, varieties, controversies.

Good luck, I shall keep an eye on your page and see if i can help more. Bee Taylor (discuss • contribs) 06:47, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a solid chapter which is theory-heavy but also integrates review of many relevant research studies. The chapter could be improved by simplifying the written expression and making greater use of the interactive potential of the wiki editing environment. For more feedback see these copyedits and the comments below. Theory The Overview could benefit from establishing clear focus questions. It could also be helpful to include an example or case study. Abbreviate the general theoretical material (e.g., about prejudice) and provide references and links to further information. This would allow a greater proportion of the chapter to consider the relation between prejudice and emotion. What is "active facilitation" etc.? (explain) A strength of this chapter is the use of social psychological theory to help explain the relationship between emotion and prejudice. Research There is effective citations of many relevant research studies. When describing important research studies, provide some indication of the nature of the method. When discussing important research findings, indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship. Written expression Written expression is reasonable but could be improved: Write in third person rather than first person (e.g., avoid "I', "we", "our", "your" etc.). Write for an international, not just an Australian, audience. Avoid one sentence paragraphs. A paragraph should typically consist of three to five sentences. Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences. Some clarification templates have been added to the page. Layout Add bullet-points for See also and External links. Some images are used, but the chapter could be improved by adding more images. Learning features The chapter makes limited use of interwiki links - more could be added. Quiz questions could be used to encourage reader engagement. Grammar and proofreading The grammar of some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags). Colons (:) are over-used. APA style Put in-text citations in alphabetical order. The reference list is not in full APA style.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 12:35, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a basic, but sufficient presentation. Structure and content Overview Not provided Selection and organisation Well selected body content but would need abbreviation to fit in an Overview and a Conclusion. However, note that the question is "How does emotion contribute to prejudice?" - the first half of the presentation is really about how prejudice contributes to emotion, which is not the topic question. Tajful -> Tajfel (minor) Mixture of theory and research. Doesn't clearly address a self-help theme. Citations and references are included. Conclusion None provided. A Conclusion slide summarising the take-home messages / key points could be helpful. Take-home messages / key points are well summarised. Communication Audio Well narrated. Audio is clear and well-paced. Consider using greater intonation to enhance engagement.[1] Visuals Add Title slide Add Overview Basic - approximately half a dozen text-based slides with some images. Consider including more images, figures, and/or tables. Visuals are clear and easy to read. Production quality Overall, basic production. Meta-data Include title slide with full title of book chapter. Link to the book chapter provided. References provided. In the Description, summarise the presentation. Audio recording quality Very good Image/video recording quality Sufficient Remove grey shading to enhance contrast Licensing A copyright license for the presentation is correctly shown in at least one location. Creative Commons.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)