Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2016/Group motivation and weight loss

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comments[edit source]

Heres a reference for your page http://heb.sagepub.com/content/31/2/143.short Health Promotion by Social Cognitive Means - Bandura, 2004

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871403X07000488 Group behavior therapy versus individual behavior therapy for healthy dieting and weight control management in overweight and obese women living in rural community - Waleekhachonloeta,Limwattananonb, Limwattananonb, Gross (2007) (thats a mouthful)

Also, the negative effects of groups on weight loss http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X10001461 Friendship Group Influences on Body Dissatisfaction and Dieting Among Adolescent Girls: A Prospective Study Woelders,Larsen, Scholte, Cillessen, Rutger, Engels, (2010)

It also might be interesting to talk about weight loss reality TV shows such as the biggest loser as an example of group weight loss --Arlo Porter (discusscontribs) 01:00, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I thought maybe you could use examples such as group classes at gyms, like zumba (dance), or circuit class, etc as they inspire people to work harder and are all group focused? Maybe looking at advertisement on gym websites could provide some interesting ideas? Good luck!--U3083662 (discusscontribs) 11:38, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hi there! I found an interesting article that I think will be useful to you chapter. It's about social facilitation (or 'audience effect') as a treatment method for obesity and makes mention of the socio-ecological model which the research was based on. The article is called: Social facilitation maintenance treatment for adults with obesity: study protocol for a randomised-controlled feasibility study (SFM study) by Anja Hilbert. Hope you find this helpful, good luck! --U3117275 (discusscontribs) 11:55, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hay, I noticed that you do not have much information for Goal Setting Theory. I found this article that pretty much outlines GST and the advances that have been made in GST. At least, it is an interesting read about GST. The article is New Directions in Goal-Setting Theory by Edwin A. Locke and Gary P. Latham I hope this helps --U3119480 (discusscontribs) 14:50, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting topic and seems to be coming together for you. I have found the AIHW has some really good health publications that you may find useful. The link is http://aihw.gov.au/risk-factors-diseases-and-death-publications/ . Hope this helps. U109993 (discusscontribs) 04:54, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hey you have an excellent topic I am going to link my page to yours as mine is on long term goal achievement. you should also look at linking with some of the other goal setting topics like grit u3115326 22/10/16

Key terms[edit source]

Rather than have key terms in a separate section, I recommend defining each term, as necessary, when the term is introduced, with the internal link to a corresponding Wikipedia article.

If in doubt, check Wikipedia articles - they generally don't have a separate key terms section. -- Jtneill - Talk - c 07:19, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a fantastic chapter which makes effective use of the wiki environment and provides an integrated, indepth, but very readable synthesis of psychological theory and research on the topic.
  2. The chapter is over the maximum word-count.
  3. For more feedback see these copyedits and the comments below.
  4. Feel free to make ongoing changes to the chapter if you wish to address any of these comments or make other improvements.

Theory[edit source]

  1. Excellent coverage of theory, although perhaps this is the content which could be most readily abbreviated to fit in to the maximum word count.
  2. Clear Overview and Conclusion, with excellent coverage of theory and research and fitting with the book theme.

Research[edit source]

  1. The chapter is well supported by critical review of key research.
  2. Great to see use of meta-analytic findings.
  3. When discussing important research findings, indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.

Written expression[edit source]

  1. Written expression is excellent.
    1. The chapter successfully addresses the topic and book theme.
  2. Structure and headings
    1. The chapter is well-structured.
  3. Layout
    1. Some images are used; perhaps the chapter could be improved by adding more images.
  4. Integration with other chapters
    1. The chapter provides an excellent range of integrated, relevant links to other Wikiversity pages.
  5. Learning features
    1. Excellent use of interwiki links to other book chapters and to relevant Wikipedia articles.
    2. Some links to Wikipedia and/or Wikiversity articles were added as external links - these should be changed to interwiki links.
  6. Spelling, grammar, and proofreading are excellent.
  7. APA style
    1. The reference list is not in full APA style.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 13:47, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Wow, this is a brilliant presentation!!!

Structure and content[edit source]

  1. Overview
    1. Great Overview - sets up and establishes the problem and its importance in a clear, fun, and understandable way.
  2. Selection and organisation
    1. Wonderfully well selected and synthesised content based on theory and research.
    2. Well structured.
    3. Fabulous use of animated examples.
  3. Conclusion
    1. Take-home messages / key points are brilliantly summarised.

Communication[edit source]

  1. Audio
    1. Great pacing, clarity, and intonation.
  2. Image/Video
    1. Visuals are wonderfully engaging.
    2. The combination of animated images and text is highly effective.

Production quality[edit source]

  1. Overall, exceptionally well produced.
  2. Meta-data
    1. Well titled.
    2. A link to the presentation is not provided from book chapter (a link has now been added).
    3. Link to chapter provided.
    4. Good use of the Description field to provide relevant information.
  3. Audio recording quality
    1. Excellent
  4. Image/video recording quality
    1. Excellent
  5. Licensing
    1. The copyright licenses and sources of the images are indicated.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 05:34, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]