Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2015/Workplace motivation and autonomy

Heading casing

FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development ~~~~

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a solid chapter which could be improved by greater attention to proofreading. For more feedback see these copyedits and the comments below. Theory Theory is well covered and explained. Research Research is well covered and explained. The Reeve (2015) textbook is over-used as a citation; preferably consult and cite primary, peer-reviewed sources. When describing important research studies, provide some indication of the nature of the sample and possibly cultural context. When discussing important research findings, indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship. Written expression Written expression Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences. Avoid directional referencing (e.g., above, below, as previously mentioned). The quality of written expression could be improved (e.g., see where clarification templates have been added to the page). Layout See earlier comments about heading casing Convert word processing bullet-points into wiki bullet points. Learning features Provide interwiki link(s) to SDT chapter(s). Quiz questions could be used to encourage reader engagement. Grammar and proofreading Check and correct the use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., individuals vs. individual's vs. individuals'). Check and remove extra capitalisations of some words. The grammar of some sentences could be improved (e.g., see the tags). APA style Add APA style captions to tables and figures. Check and correct the use of "&" vs. "and" (Use ampersand (&) inside brackets and "and" outside brackets). Check and correct the APA style for how to report numbers (Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numbers (e.g., 10)). The reference list is not in full APA style.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a solid, well researched presentation. Structure and content Well structured, with theory, research, citations, and some general examples. Communication Take the time to explain the focus questions (these are skipped over). Audio is clear and well-paced. Visuals are clear and easy to read. Production quality Overall, well produced. Fill out the description field (e.g., brief description of presentation, link back to the book chapter, license details).

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 12:20, 26 November 2015 (UTC)