Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2015/Transtheoretical model of change and motivation

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Heading casing[edit source]

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings. For example, use:

==Cats and dogs==

rather than

==Cats and Dogs==

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:40, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a poor chapter in large part because of the poor quality written expression and that so much of it consists of direct quotes for ideas and information which should be expressed uniquely. The chapter also doesn't clearly address the question (i.e., TM and motivation; it focused on TM) and is written as an essay rather than an online, interactive book chapter. For more feedback see these copyedits and the comments below.
  2. The TM and related theories are well described, with a critical approach.
  3. More examples could be helpful.

Theory[edit source]

No comment

Research[edit source]

  1. Research, particularly related to motivation, could be more extensively described.
  2. When describing important research studies, provide some indication of the nature of the sample and possibly cultural context.
  3. When discussing important research findings, indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.

Written expression[edit source]

  1. Written expression was poor.
    1. Write in third person rather than first person (e.g., "we")
    2. Some sentences are overly long; rewrite.
    3. Check consistency of capitalisation (e.g., Transtheoretical model and Transtheoretical Model)
  2. Layout
    1. Minimal use of tables, figures, links etc.
  3. Spelling
    1. Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize -> hypothesise)
  4. Grammar and proofreading
    1. The grammar of some sentences needs to be improved for the written expression to be of professional standard (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags)
  5. APA style
    1. Direct quotes need page numbers.
    2. Direct quotes are over-used. Provide unique expression.
    3. Check and correct the APA style formatting of in-text citations.
    4. Add APA style captions to tables and figures.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:40, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a very basic presentation.

Structure and content[edit source]

  1. The presentation focuses on theory.
  2. Consider adding more research.
  3. Consider adding some examples.

Communication[edit source]

  1. Audio is well-paced.
  2. Create more slides to accompany the audio - the presentation relies fundamentally on audio, with a very small number of slides and very limited visuals.
  3. Consider including images.

Production quality[edit source]

  1. A copyright license for the presentation is not indicated (e.g., in the description or in the presentation slides).
  2. No link is provided back to the book chapter.
  3. Rename the title so that it is more descriptive and meaningful (e.g., it doesn't mention motivation).
  4. Fill out the description field (e.g., brief description of presentation, license details, link back to chapter).

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:53, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]