Jump to content

Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2015/Texting while driving motivation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikiversity
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Jtneill in topic Multimedia feedback


Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall

[edit source]
  1. Overall, this is a solid chapter which would benefit by being rewritten in order to improve the quality of written expression.
  2. For more feedback see [ these copyedits] and the comments below.
  1. Theory is reasonably well covered.
  2. Addition of case studies or additional examples could be helpful.
  1. Research is reasonably well covered.
  2. Some statements were unreferenced (e.g., see the [factual?] tags)
  3. When describing important research studies, provide some indication of the nature of the sample and possibly cultural context.
  4. When discussing important research findings, indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.
  1. Written expression could be improved.
    1. The Overview doesn't mention driving!?
    2. Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences.
    3. The Conclusion is brief; expand to summarise key theoretical perspectives and research findings, and offer take-home messages.
    4. The quality of written expression could be improved (e.g., see where clarification templates have been added to the page).
    5. Avoid directional referencing (e.g., above, below, as previously mentioned).
  2. Layout
    1. See earlier comments about heading casing
    2. There is no use of images or tables.
  3. Learning features
    1. The chapter makes no use of interwiki links.
    2. Quiz questions are used effectively to encourage reader engagement.
  4. Spelling
    1. Spelling could be improved (e.g., see the [spelling?] tags).
  5. Grammar and proofreading
    1. The grammar of many sentences needs to be improved for the written expression to be of professional standard (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags).
    2. Check and correct the use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., individuals vs. individual's vs. individuals').
  6. APA style
    1. The reference list is not in full APA style.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)Reply


Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall

[edit source]
  1. Overall, this is a basic, but sufficient presentation.
  1. Some theory is covered.
  2. More research could be covered.
  3. Perhaps consider using more illustrative examples.
  4. Some take-home messages are suggested.
  1. Visuals are basic slides/text. Consider incorporating diagrams/pictures.
  2. Check and correct grammar of transcript.
  3. Present in the third person (i.e., avoid "I", "my", "we" etc.) because the presentation should be about the topic, not the presenter.
  4. Audio is well-paced.
  5. Visuals are easy to read.
  6. Consider using greater intonation to enhance engagement.
  1. The presentation should stand alone without the viewer having to go to the book chapter.
  2. Audio has a lot of white noise - review microphone set-up.
  3. Rename the title so that it includes the subtitle (and matches the book chapter) - the student number of the presenter is not of interest to an international viewer.
  4. Fill out the description field (e.g., brief description of presentation, link back to the book chapter, and license details).
  5. A copyright license for the presentation is not indicated (i.e., in the description or in the presentation slides).
  6. No link is provided back to the book chapter.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:53, 3 December 2015 (UTC)Reply