Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is a promising chapter which could be improved by improving the quality of written expression and making use of the interactive potential of the wiki environment.
For more feedback see these copyedits and the comments below.
The neurochemistry of MDMA is well described. Ideally, incorporate images to help illustrate the text. However, this material could also be abbreviated, with links provided to MDMA for more detail, to allow greater focus on theory about the combined use of MDMA in psychotherapy.
I think that this claim is highly problematic: "If the substance MDMA was addictive, every individual who has ever tried it, would be an addict." because, for example, alcohol is addictive, but not everyone is addicted to alcohol etc.
The quality of written expression could be improved (e.g., see where clarification templates have been added to the page).
Use default heading styles; remove bold
The chapter is well-structured.
The layout is minimal.
No images or tables were used.
Add Interwiki links (e.g., to relevant Wikipedia articles and other Wikiversity book chapters) to make the text more interactive.
Quiz questions could be used to encourage reader engagement.
Spelling could be improved - see the [spelling?] tags.
The grammar of many sentences needs to be improved for the written expression to be of professional standard (e.g., see the [grammar?] tags).
APA style
Check and correct the APA style for how to report numbers (Numbers under 10 should be written in words (e.g., five); numbers 10 and over should be written in numbers (e.g., 10)).
When there are three or more authors, subsequent citations should use et al. (e.g., Smith, Bush and Western (2001) first and and then Smith et al. (2001) subsequently).
Check and correct matching of in-text citations with the reference list (e.g., Greer and Tolbert (1990) is cited, but is not in the reference list).
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.
Overall, the content is well organised and presented.
Include citations.
Perhaps consider using more illustrative images.
Abbreviate the description of MDMA and its psychological effects and expand the material about theory and research into the use of MDMA with psychotherapy.
Long-term effects slide was skipped?
A Conclusion slide summarising the take-home messages / key points could be helpful.
Rename the title so that it includes the subtitle (and matches the book chapter).
Fill out the description field (e.g., brief description of presentation, link back to the book chapter, license details, and possibly include references and image attributions).
A copyright license for the presentation is not indicated (i.e., in the description or in the presentation slides).
