Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2015/Love and lust

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comments[edit source]

Hello, I had a look at your topic and I figured that if you were to include Drive theory by Hull, it might explain the concept of lust. Here is a link to the Wikipedia site, hope its useful =D

Hey. Great content so far! I have just added an image of 'romantic love' to make it more aesthetically pleasing - I hope you don't mind? Well done!! U3048330 (discusscontribs)

Heading casing[edit source]

Crystal Clear app ktip.svg
FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings. For example, use:

==Cats and dogs==

rather than

==Cats and Dogs==

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:27, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Wikiuutiset logo typewriter.png

Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a fantastic chapter which makes effective use of the wiki environment and provides an integrated, indepth, but very readable synthesis of psychological theory and research on the topic. For more feedback see these copyedits and the comments below.

Theory[edit source]

  1. Theory is very well described and integrated.
  2. Perhaps some case studies/examples could be helpful.

Research[edit source]

  1. Research is very well described and integrated.
  2. When describing important research studies, provide some indication of the nature of the sample and possibly cultural context.
  3. When discussing important research findings, indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship.

Written expression[edit source]

  1. Written expression is generally excellent.
  2. Some paragraphs are overly long. Each paragraph should communicate one key idea in three to five sentences.
  3. Layout
    1. See earlier comments about heading casing
    2. Use default heading styles; remove colons
    3. The chapter is well-structured.
    4. Figures were used, but Tables and Figures could be used more extensively.
  4. Learning features
    1. The chapter makes excellent use of interwiki links.
    2. Quiz questions are used effectively to encourage reader engagement.
  5. Spelling, grammar, and proofreading are generally excellent.
  6. APA style
    1. Check and correct use of et al. (no comma before and full stop after)
    2. The reference list is not in full APA style.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 02:27, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.


Overall[edit source]

  1. Overall, this is a basic, but sufficient presentation.

Structure and content[edit source]

  1. Well structured.
  2. Takes a position; makes an argument (good).
  3. Perhaps consider using more illustrative examples.

Communication[edit source]

  1. The presentation is somewhat text-dense and some text is too small.
  2. Consider using images.
  3. Excellent intonation.

Production quality[edit source]

  1. Overall, simple but effective production.
  2. Provide a clickable link back to the book chapter.
  3. Fill out the description field with more detail (e.g., brief description of presentation, link back to the book chapter, license details)
  4. A copyright license for the presentation is not indicated (e.g., in the description or in the presentation slides).

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:26, 26 November 2015 (UTC)