Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2014/Suicide prevention

Heading casing

FYI, the convention on Wikiversity is for lower-cased headings. For example, use: ==Cats and dogs== rather than ==Cats and Dogs== -- Jtneill - Talk - c 08:58, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Multimedia feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.

Overall Overall, ... Structure and content Content is somewhat informative about suicidality treatment but doesn't seem to address the specific question which is about how our client motivations utilised in suicide prevention programs. Communication Slides were OK. Production quality URL not working; .ppt slides were emailed to convener; the presentation isn't available online. No working audio was provided with the slides.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 12:30, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this was a solid, promising, well-researched chapter. For more feedback, see these copyedits and comments below. Theory The argument presented for using Maslow's hierarchy of needs to explain suicidality is weak. The model is presented, discounted on the basis on a large study, then used in a speculative argument. Remove this section. The rest of the structure and coverage of theories behind treatments is excellent. Research Relevant research is well described and integrated. When describing important research findings, indicate the size of effects in addition to whether or not there was an effect or relationship. Written expression Written expression This chapter is well over the 4500 maximum word count. Layout See earlier comments about heading casing Use Heading Level 2, then Level 3, etc. Coloured boxes were removed to aid readability; keep the style simple (e.g., as per Wikipedia articles) Learning features Images and tables were not used; An image was uploaded without sufficient information about copyright, so this has been removed. The text could become more interactive by including interwiki links. APA style et al -> et al. The reference list is not in full APA style. Remove issue numbers for seriated journal references.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 13:06, 4 December 2014 (UTC)