Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's Moodle site. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener. If you wish to dispute the marks, see the suggested marking dispute process.
There was a nice effort coverage of theory and why sex is a stress reliever, and there was good balance with the negative side effects of sex on stress. For improvement, consider more theory coverage and including a discussion of more specific research studies
Overall, Jing was used to good effect. For improvement, the use of a case study or real life example, as well as changing of the voice tone and overview and conclusion slides might help to further engage the viewer.
The visual quality was sound, however the sound was extremely low. Relevant link, image refs and licensing info must also be included, thus this presentation likely violates copyright law. Courtney.Bruce (discuss • contribs) 03:50, 23 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Chapter marks will be available later via Moodle, along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.
Overall, this is a short chapter which provides limited coverage of relevant psychological theory and research about the topic. For more feedback see these copyedits and the comments below.
The chapter does not explain psychological theories of stress.
It is unclear whether the chapter is focusing on the effects of stress on sex or the effects of sex on stress or both (clarify). The topic, as set, is about the effects of sex on stress, but the section on performance anxiety, for example, seems to more about the effect of stress on sex.
The discussion about oxytocin is only loosely related to sex; this could be strengthened.
Performance anxiety is defined in a sexual context, but it has a much broader definition in psychology (i.e., it relates to anxiety prior and during any kind of behavioural performance).
Discussion of body image lacks clear correspondence to the relationship between sex and stress.
Obtaining comments on an earlier draft could have helped to improve the chapter.
User gender-neutral language (e.g., mankind -> humankind)
More linking sentences between sections would help the reader to understand the chapter (e.g., why is the Overview section (which doesn't mention orgasm) immediately followed by the Orgasm section?)
Write in third person rather than first person (e.g., "we")
The Conclusion could be strengthened by offering some concrete take-home messages.
See the clarification templates that have been added to the article for further suggestions about where and how the written expression could be improved.
Learning features
No images or tables are used.
Interwiki links could be added to make the text more interactive.
Layout
See earlier comments about heading casing.
Some images are used, but the chapter could be improved by adding more images.
Figure captions should be more explanatory.
Spelling
Use Australian spelling.
Grammar and proofreading
Check and correct the use/non-use of ownership apostrophes (e.g., cultures vs. culture's)
APA style
Check APA style for direct quotes.
Check formatting of in-text citations (e.g., (Gunter &Wykes, 2005))
The first words in the Overview are now "sexual intercourse" but the title and subtitle refer to sex and sexual activity respectively. Greater clarity in terminology would be ideal.
Some spelling errors have been corrected; some spelling errors have been introduced (e.g., "phycological")
Some citations have been added.
Some, but not all, uses of "we" have been rewritten into third person perspective.